If a common pattern is used it makes sense to give it a name of its own. This simplifies communication at the least. If someone asks a question on the best approach to do X, then I could reply simply: "use currying" or "use a continuation" and it would make sense instead of describing in detail what "currying" or a "continuation" is. So its not just "javascript people" its users of most languages.
On Feb 17, 2:32 pm, Jason Mulligan <[email protected]> wrote: > That's hilarious ... do all javascript people just make up names for > ops and call it patterns? -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
