I prefer the use of .reverse() with the countdown, since that can be compiler optimized and still out perform the forward iteration in older browsers. It's difference should only come into play when dealing with arrays >50k
On Mar 14, 12:32 am, RobG <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 14, 1:34 pm, RobG <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mar 13, 9:31 am, Jason Mulligan <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > var instances = [], > > > i = arg.length; > > > > while (i--) { > > > instances.push($(arg[i], nodelist)); > > > } > > > return instances; > > The use of a decrementing counter reverses the order of returned > elements, so given (id1, id2) it returns (element2, element1). To > return elemetns in the order requested, consider: > > for (var i=0, iLen=arg.length; i<iLen; i++) { > instances.push(...); > } > > -- > Rob -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
