I also want to add a note of agreement with Asen. If the OP hasn't replied with any JavaScript in a few days then I think the post should be deleted.
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Nathan Sweet <[email protected]>wrote: > I completely agree with the sentiment against the OP here. If someone links > to a blog post here, even if it's their own, to talk about JavaScript I'm > fine with it; plus I might want to subscribe to their blog. I would have > been much more interested in what the OP, Garrett, had to say if he (I'm > assuming you're a man) had talked about the issue he had tried to correct. > Otherwise it feels like sour grapes to me -- be brave and tell us about your > issue with his blog. > > On a side note, Zakas is the lead front-end guy for one of the Alexa 5 > websites, and, in particular, one of the 5 that displays a lot of > information, I'm sure that the amount of emails he receives in a day would > boggle most of our minds (at least my mind), even by dev standards. I'm sure > he's insanely busy, and not posting your comment on his own blog is > completely warranted. I have to admit, it would have been nice if he had > dropped you a quick line explaining why. Also accusing Zakas of career > building is a little funny since he's probably one of the few people in the > world making over 200k to mess around with JavaScript. > > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:54 AM, keif <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd suggest if you feel his blog post is incorrect, you write a blog >> post that corrects it (and explain why what you have written is "more >> correct" >> >> -keif >> >> On May 21, 2:27 am, dhtml <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hey all, >> > >> > Just wanted to throw out a friendly bit of advice to the newbies. >> > >> > Blog author and JSMentor "Nicholas Zakas" censors his blog comments >> > and doesn't take any feedback or criticism. >> > >> > I sometimes try and correct wrong advice when I see it. But it sure is >> > frustrating when the author hides/disproves comments that I took time >> > to write out. >> > >> > I can understand promoting one's career but the author's act of >> > censoring a purely technical comments should give a clue that maybe >> > there's something something wrong with what was written (or why would >> > he have to censor it, when he could just rebut). >> > >> > If it was an accident, then I apologize, however, I don't even bother >> > emailing him anymore because it never worked out in the past. This has >> > happened before and went through the emails/messages on Twitter but >> > didn't get responses that way. >> > >> > Just a notice for the community here about Zakas' blog. >> > >> > Garrett >> >> -- >> To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> > > -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
