Isn't that what its supposed to http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-api/#nodeselector
<http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-api/#nodeselector>Whats the difference in Chrome, FF? nodelist is non-live in all of them. On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Nathan Sweet <[email protected]>wrote: > I meant <IE9, IE9 also only returns elements in its nodelists, unlike the > others. > > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Andrew Dodson > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> querySelectorAll is enabled in IE9, checkout "ie9 testdrive". >> >> On 28 May 2011 19:50, "nathanJsweet" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So I've been messing around with querySelectorAll. I've published >> a blog post about it which can be found at "nathansweet.me/ >> queryselectorall", >> though I'm not really plugging the post, which actually doesn't have >> so >> much information concerning the method as it does a link to a page >> I've created that tests the method. >> >> I'm asking anybody in this group who is interested take a look >> at this page (it can be found at "nathansweet.me/queryselectorall- >> rundown") >> and email me, respond to this post, or comment on the blog post any >> other selector ideas they can come up with. My goal would be to come >> up with an exhaustive list of selectors that I could then run through >> a multitude of browsers (I would, of course, share the results). I've >> already come up with some interesting failures that shouldn't be >> occurring, >> and I'm also interested to hear from people who've worked with the >> method extensively. >> >> Also am I wrong in thinking that since querySelectorAll isn't >> implemented in IE >> that it will always return only elements? Thus, is it safe to do >> Array.prototype.slice.call >> on any nodelist returned by querySelectorAll? I haven't thought of a >> case yet where >> this wouldn't be a bad idea, let me know. >> >> Also, if nobody helps it's no big deal, as I will be adding selectors >> to it over the coming weeks, >> so if you're into bookmarking it might be worth coming back for a >> second or third look. >> >> -- >> To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> >> -- >> To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> > > -- > To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
