Nathan, your feedback has already surpassed what I've received.  Thank
you!

On Oct 5, 10:18 am, Nathan Sweet <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I haven't received the quality of feedbck that I'm looking for..
>
> You might not find it here either.
>
> There are a few issues going on here:
>
> 1. There is a structural issue in the way you organize you're code. You
> expose two global variables when you don't need to, not that it matters that
> much in this case. You are using a simple run-the-code-once scenario, which
> I personally think warrants the use of an anonymous object, but an anonymous
> function works well. Still, there is no need to initialize your code outside
> the function, in fact if everything was a function declaration you could
> initialize above all your functions. This is what an anonymous object looks
> like:
> ({
>       Init :function(){/*run your code*/},
>       method1:function(){this.method2();},
>       method2:function(){/*does something*/}
>
> }).Init()
>
> 2. Just being nitpicky, you've built a getElementsByClass method, and I'm
> not entirely sure what it does, but I see you're checking the individual
> className of the elements in the method. Chrome has a built in method for
> getting elements by class.
>
> 3. Lines 66-81 are painful, and I think you know it. Instead of looping
> through every element, try giving all the elements a unique id, or something
> like that, so that you can hash the results of one of those arrays and
> create an O(n) loop instead of an O(n*n) pattern.
>
> 4. Buy this 
> book:http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/047022780X?ie=UTF8&tag=nczonline-20&;...
> or this 
> book:http://www.amazon.com/JavaScript-Good-Parts-Douglas-Crockford/dp/0596...
> there are a lot of gadflies in your code that could be easily fixed, these
> two books will set you straight.
>
> There is more I could touch on, but those are the big ones. I'm assuming you
> wanted a code review for the pleasure of it, because given the platform you
> are coding for your mistakes aren't that bad, because your application isn't
> that big. Chrome will be very forgiving of every mistake you made. In the
> future, try bringing in some cross-browser work you've done and are proud
> of, and there will be much more room for people to criticize, because as it
> stands I'm sure your application will work fine, and nobody is going to be
> able to suggest anything, from a purely code point of view, that will vastly
> improve this app.
>
> All the best.
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:21 AM, bittersweetryan <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I've been trying quite hard to get more professional with my
> > JavaScript development lately.  I've been doing a lot of reading (blog
> > posts, Crockford's book, and Haverbeke's book).  Since reading about
> > JavaScript is only part of the puzzle I've written a chrome extension
> > to try to put what I've read to use.
>
> > Unfortunately I work for a small company and I don't have anybody to
> > do a code review to help me see my errors and learn from them.  I
> > totally agree with Addy Osmani's comments on his blog post "Avoiding
> > The Quirks: Lessons From A JavaScript Code Review" on how valuable a
> > code review can be.  I've tried to post my code on
> > codereview.stackexchange.com, however I haven't received the quality
> > of feedbck that I'm looking for.
>
> > The codebase isn't huge ~300 lines and its up on github -
> >https://github.com/bittersweetryan/GitHub-News-Filter.  If anybody has
> > the time to look at it and give me some advise on what I could be
> > doing better I'd really, really appreciate it.
>
> > Ryan
>
> > --
> > To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> > To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
> >http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]

-- 
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to