[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-38?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658715#action_12658715
]
Craig Russell commented on JSPWIKI-38:
--------------------------------------
> What I am looking for here is that I strongly believe that API classes should
> be isolated in their own package hierarchy in order to provide a clear visual
> and logical separation of the implementation classes. It does not have to be
> called "org.apache.jspwiki.api" - it could also be called "org.jspwiki" or
> "org.apache.wiki" - whatever.
If you're in Apache, you're in the apache name space: org.apache.jspwiki or
org.apache.whateverWeChangeTheNameToNext.
As far as I know, we're not talking about multiple independent implementations
of a standard or common API. So having an org.apache.wiki interface doesn't
sound right.
But let's not continue on the thread of discussing keeping the
com.ecyrd.jspwiki name space in Apache. That is a non-starter.
> Rename packages to "org.apache.jspwiki"
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: JSPWIKI-38
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-38
> Project: JSPWiki
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Janne Jalkanen
> Assignee: Janne Jalkanen
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
