+1
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Janne Jalkanen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps we should delegate them to a "Future version"? That way they would > stay open, but not show up in most lists. > > /Janne > > On May 2, 2010, at 12:40 , Harry Metske wrote: > >> Florian, >> >> I just try to keep the list of open issues to a reasonable size. >> There are so many issues that are open for years with no activity at all, >> they just clutter up the list. >> Every now and then I walk through the list and propose to close some >> issues >> that appear to be abandoned and are not serious bugs. >> >> But if we want to keep those open, that's fine too. >> >> best regards, >> Harry >> >> >> 2010/5/2 Florian Holeczek <[email protected]> >> >>> Hi Harry, >>> >>> recently you've commented some issues with the question whether we get a >>> patch, otherwise we'd close this issue. >>> >>> IMO we shouldn't do this, as long as it's a valid issue. >>> >>> Why would you want to close them? >>> >>> Regards >>> Florian >>> > >
