2009/2/7 Adrian Custer wrote: > (Off topic) > > This is a particularly unfortunate example since this very question (for > England, not Canada) was the title of a landmark scientific paper which > showed the question to be meaningless. >
Even more off topic.. but it's interesting to see that over 40 years after its publication, this paper is still regularly cited. It hasn't yet undergone the final transition of a classic paper - to become so much part of our worldview that we take it for granted and don't even think to cite it. Apologies to the OP for this little highjack :) Michael _______________________________________________ jts-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
