That's OK it's a pretty interesting hijack ;-). On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Michael Bedward <[email protected]>wrote:
> 2009/2/7 Adrian Custer wrote: > > (Off topic) > > > > This is a particularly unfortunate example since this very question (for > > England, not Canada) was the title of a landmark scientific paper which > > showed the question to be meaningless. > > > > Even more off topic.. but it's interesting to see that over 40 years > after its publication, this paper is still regularly cited. It hasn't > yet undergone the final transition of a classic paper - to become so > much part of our worldview that we take it for granted and don't even > think to cite it. > > Apologies to the OP for this little highjack :) > > Michael > _______________________________________________ > jts-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel >
_______________________________________________ jts-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
