For what it is worth, I learn a great deal from other people's discussions
on this list. If everyone were to reply to the sender the list would have
diminished value for me.

I am obviously just one person, but I am sure there are plenty of others who
feel the same.

Gregg

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Clayton Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Research Triangle Java User's Group mailing list." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Juglist] Nov JUG talk resources


> To play a little devil's advocate and add to the public discussion:
>
> It depends on your view as to whether it is a problem. If the reply-to
> goes to the sender instead of the list then all of those people who
> mistakenly send to the list when they meant to send to the individual
> will be happy. However, all of those people who are expecting to reply
> and add to the public discussion on the list now have the potential to
> mistakenly send to the individual and add nothing to the public
discussion.
>
> Since posting to the list is meant for public consumption then the
> expectation is that the replies would be meant for public consumption.
> Private discussions spawned from the list are not the primary purpose of
> the list and therefore replies should go to the list.
>
> After having said all of that, I am not sure if I really care whether
> the reply goes to the sender or the list. I will just check who I am
> sending it to before I send it.
>
> --clayton
>
> saraiya shobha wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Understand that this is a discussion group, but I agree with Richard
> > and many others, when you say "reply to sender" it should go to sender
> > and not the list. I belonged to couple other discussiongroups and they
> > used to have same problem initially and they have now
> > reconfigured.  It works fine. So there is a way to change and this is
> > not the only option we have currently.   Just a thought!
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > _Shobha_.
> >
> > */"Richard O. Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
> >
> >     I would prefer that the default reply be addressed to the sender of
> >     the message, and not to the list. But this discussion will recur
less
> >     often when email clients give the sender the option, rather than
> >     blindly follow the way the list is configured.
> >
> >     Rich Hammer
> >
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Juglist mailing list
> >     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
> > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/slv/mailtag/*http://companion.yahoo.com/>
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Juglist mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Juglist mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org


_______________________________________________
Juglist mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org

Reply via email to