I was thinking that a small study group on a specific subject would have discussions that would not be of interest to the group as a whole (logistics, syllabus etc.)and would only be in existence for a short amount of time it would be appropriate to have a smaller distribution. Also, one of the points that was made at the NoFluffJustStuff Symposium is that experienced java developers have a tendency to be arrogant condescending toward less experienced java programmers and that if we want to see java continue to flourish, we need to be more supportive of people coming up the learning curve. So with that intent, I thought that on a smaller distribution, where everyone is in the same boat of learning a new technology, people would be more willing to ask questions and share ideas.
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 14:31, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > As much as I hate JSF, why are we creating new mail lists to break up the > TriJUG? This list is so low traffic that I see no reason to do so. > > On 12/5/03 6:51 AM, "Daniel Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, David - > > > > I went to yahoogroup and could not find trijugJSF there. Could you give > > me a link so that > > I can join in it with my yahoo account? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Daniel > > > > David Moran wrote: > > > >> It looks like there is some interest in pursuing this so I created a > >> Yahoo Group, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone wishing to participate > >> should join the group and we will figure out the logistics there. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Juglist mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org _______________________________________________ Juglist mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org
