Form Authentication with SSL works acceptably.  Actually password anything
isn't really that secure.  However Form/SSL is acceptable for most apps.
You can't have anything more than mimic security without encryption.  The
session is keyed to a token.  If its not encrypted, I can intercept it and
probably change your password or at least have fun for a session.


-andy

> From: "Richard O. Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Research Triangle Java User's Group mailing
> list."<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:50:14 -0400
> To: "Research Triangle Java User's Group mailing list."<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Juglist] Re: HTTP authentication -- was too few warnings among us
> about bad code
> 
> Hugh Allen wrote:
>>     * HTTP basic authentication
>>     * Form-based authentication
>> * Client-certificate authentication
> 
> I had lumped HTTP Basic authentication together with FORM
> authentication, and meant both of them when I wrote about "HTTP
> authentication" in my last post.  I was thinking that form based
> authentication was a kind of HTTP authentication, but I may be
> mistaken about that.  Anyhow, form-based authentication is what I have
> recently found to have enough gotchas to drive me to look for better,
> maybe to write my own.
> 
> 
>> It appears that Form-based authentication, when combined with SSL, is
>> flexible and does not expose passwords or messages in plain text.
> 
> I agree.  It APPEARS decent.  But how often is it actually used in
> serious work?
> 
>> ... This
>> is what I plan to use for my production environment, but I haven't
>> gotten the SSL cert yet.
> 
> Based upon my limited experience, I warn you against form based
> authentication.  The SSL part has worked without difficulty for me,
> however.
> 
> Thank you for the links.
> 
> Rich Hammer
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Juglist mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org


_______________________________________________
Juglist mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org

Reply via email to