I think its of interest to the JUG (local Java-related conferences), but I think toning down the volume and frequency might be in order for this particular one. The last equally ominous post was on the 17th which is probably a little too aggressive.
In the past I contacted Jay to request that he not send HTML mail + JPGs to the list in his ads and he responded. I suggest either you or the board do the same rather than here. These types of "should it be or should it not be" discussions tend to take up more space than the actual "it". -Andy > From: "Richard O. Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Research Triangle Java User's Group mailing > list."<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:19:01 -0400 > To: "Research Triangle Java User's Group mailing list."<[EMAIL PROTECTED] g> > Subject: Advertising through JUG, was Re: [Juglist] JUG Discounts Still > Available... >=20 > Is TriJUG getting something in exchange for the use of its mail list > and meetings to promote the =B3No Fluff, Just Stuff=B2 conference? Back > in the heady days of the bubble we used to demand pay, and good pay, > from sponsors who got limited advertising opportunities in exchange. >=20 > I appreciated David Geary's TriJUG talk in March. That was worth > something, if we have started the practice of paying for well prepared > talks. But I might have guessed that the promotion given to the =B3No > Fluff, Just Stuff=B2 conference during that March meeting evened the > score. This continued advertising may be going overboard. >=20 > Rich Hammer >=20 > Jay Zimmerman wrote: >> Research Triangle Software Symposium >>=20 >> June 11-13, 2004 >>=20 >> A =B3No Fluff, Just Stuff=B2 Conference ... >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Juglist mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org _______________________________________________ Juglist mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org
