(english / italiano)

Ben poco da festeggiare in Kosovo

Lo scorso 18 febbraio gli ambienti nazionalisti e terroristi pan-albanesi, 
accompagnati dall'orchestra e dalle majorettes del capitale monopolistico 
transnazionale, hanno "festeggiato" dieci anni di "indipendenza". Di tutt'altro 
tenore la realtà dei fatti e l'umore della gente comune, di cui ritorneremo a 
parlare. In questo post riportiamo alcuni documenti sulla occupazione militare 
USA/NATO e sulla pulizia etnica perpetrata in un ventennio.

1) CHIUDERE CAMP BONDSTEEL! CLOSE BONDSTEEL! (Belgrade Forum, 2018)
2) Illegal Occupation Of Southern Serbia: Kosovo – Analysis (Parasaran 
Rangarajan / SAAG, 2015)
3) “We Have the Right to Live”: NATO’s War on Yugoslavia and the Expulsion of 
Serbs from Kosovo (Gregory Elich, 2015)


=== 1 ===

(messaggio di saluto del Forum di Belgrado alla conferenza nazionale USA contro 
le basi all'estero, Baltimore, Maryland, 12-14 gennaio 2018)

http://www..beoforum.rs/en/comments-belgrade-forum-for-the-world-of-equals/550-bondsteel-base-to-be-closed.html
 
<http://www.beoforum.rs/en/comments-belgrade-forum-for-the-world-of-equals/550-bondsteel-base-to-be-closed.html>

BONDSTEEL BASE TO BE CLOSED 
<http://www.beoforum.rs/en/comments-belgrade-forum-for-the-world-of-equals/550-bondsteel-base-to-be-closed...html>

Wednesday, 10 January 2018

MESSAGE TO THE USA PEACE MOVEMENT AND WORLD PEACE COUNCIL


Dear friends,

We congratulate you on holding National Conference against US foreign military 
bases, to be held in Baltimore, Maryland, from 12-14 January 2018.

The Belgrade Forum for a World of Equals fully supports your initiative for 
convening a GLOBAL CONFERENCE AGAINST U.S... FOREIGN MILITARY BASES. Rising 
tensions in the global relations and hot beds of old and new crisis call for 
unity and efforts of all peace forces for closing foreign military bases, 
particularly U.S. and NATO foreign military bases, around the globe. The peace 
forces are obligated to send clear message that U.S. and NATO foreign military 
bases represent the tools of hegemonism, aggression, occupation, and that as 
such must be closed.

Peace and inclusive development, elimination of hunger and misery require 
redistribution of spending for maintence of military bases in favor of 
development needs, education and heath services. After the end of the Cold War 
the whole humanity expected stability, peace and justice in the world of equal 
states and nations. Such expectations, however, turned to be futile beliefs.

In the last two decades, instead of closing U.S. and NATO military bases in 
Europe, the continent has been interneted by new U.S. military bases. As a 
consequence there are today more U.S. military bases in Europe than at the pick 
of the Cold War. Peace and security have become more fragile and quality of 
life jeopardized.

This dangerous development was triggered in 1999 by NATO- US led aggression 
against Serbia (FR Yugoslavia). At the end of the aggression US established 
military base in zhe occupied part of the Serbian territory Kosovo and 
Metohija, called Bondsteel, which is one of the most expensive and the largest 
military bases, established after Vietnam War It was not only an illegal, but 
brutal act disrespect sovereignty of Serbia and basic principles of 
international law. Now, there is even plan to expand the base Bondsteel and to 
turn it into a permanent location of American troops and into a hub of U.S. 
military presence in South East Europe.

We strongly oppose such belicions plans, being contrary to the interests of the 
peoples of the region and source of further rising tensions between East and 
West. We demand that the Bondsteel military base be closed as well as all other 
U.S.  military bases in Europe and in the World. Preparations for war are 
sensless waste of money, energy and development opportunities.

The Belgrade forum  as integral part of the world peace movement headed by the 
WPC, stands firmly by the initiative to close all  military bases in the world 
and direct resources to development and better life of people.

We express our solidarity with efforts of the COALITION AGAINST U.S. FOREIGN 
MILITARY BASES and wish the Baltimore conference full success.

Friendly yours,
Zivadin Jovanovic
President of the Belgrade Forum for a World of Equals


---

http://www.beoforum.rs/en/comments-belgrade-forum-for-the-world-of-equals/552-close-bondsteel.html
 
<http://www.beoforum.rs/en/comments-belgrade-forum-for-the-world-of-equals/552-close-bondsteel.html>

CLOSE BONDSTEEL! 
<http://www.beoforum.rs/en/comments-belgrade-forum-for-the-world-of-equals/552-close-bondsteel.html>

Friday, 12 January 2018

Rising tensions in the global relations and hot beds of old and new crisis call 
for unity and efforts of all peace forces for closing foreign military bases, 
particularly U.S. and NATO foreign military bases, around the globe. The peace 
forces are obligated to send clear message that U.S. and NATO foreign military 
bases represent the tools of hegemonism, aggression, occupation, and that as 
such must be closed.

    Peace and inclusive development, elimination of hunger and misery require 
redistribution of spending for maintence of military bases in favor of 
development needs, education and heath services. After the end of the Cold War 
the whole humanity expected stability, peace and justice in the world of equal 
states and nations. Such expectations, however, turned to be futile beliefs.

    In the last two decades, instead of closing U.S. and NATO military bases in 
Europe, the continent has been interneted by whole chain new U.S. military 
bases in Bulgaria, Rumania, Poland, Baltic states. As a consequence there are 
today more U.S. military bases in Europe than at the pick of the Cold War. 
Peace and security have become more fragile and quality of life jeopardized.

    This dangerous development was triggered in 1999 by NATO-US led aggression 
against Serbia (FR Yugoslavia). At the end of the aggression US established 
military base in the occupied part of the Serbian territory Kosovo and 
Metohija, called Bondsteel, which is one of the most expensive and the largest 
USA military bases, established after the Vietnam War. It was not only an 
illegal, but brutal act of disrespect of sovereignty and territorial integrity 
of Serbia and other basic principles of international law. Now, there is even 
plan to expand the base Bondsteel trabsforming it into a permanent location of 
American troops and a hub of U.S. military presence in South East Europe for 
geostrategic purposes and conmfrontations.

We demand that the Bondsteel military base be closed as well as all other U.S.  
military bases in Europe and in the World. Preparations for furthering 
confrontation and new wars are sensless waste of money, energy and development 
opportunities.

    The Belgrade forum  as an integral part of the world peace movement, stands 
firmly by the initiative to close all  military bases in the world and redirect 
resources to rising development needs and people yearnings for better life.

THE BELGRADE FORUM FOR A WORLD OF EQUALS

Belgrade, January 12, 2018


--- TRAD.:

Kosovo: CHIUDERE CAMP BONDSTEEL!

Le crescenti tensioni nelle relazioni globali e le infuocate barriere delle 
vecchie e nuove crisi internazionali, richiedono l'unità e gli sforzi di tutte 
le forze di pace per chiudere le basi militari straniere, in particolare le 
basi militari straniere degli Stati Uniti e della NATO, in tutto il mondo. Le 
forze di pace devono essere impegnate a inviare un chiaro messaggio: le basi 
militari straniere degli Stati Uniti e della NATO rappresentano gli strumenti 
di egemonismo, aggressione, occupazione, e che come tali devono essere chiuse.

La pace e lo sviluppo inclusivo, l'eliminazione della fame e della miseria 
richiedono la ridistribuzione delle spese per la manutenzione delle basi 
militari a favore dei bisogni di sviluppo, dell'istruzione e dei servizi 
sanitari. Dopo la fine della Guerra Fredda l'intera umanità si aspettava 
stabilità, pace e giustizia in un mondo di stati e nazioni uguali. Tali 
aspettative, tuttavia, si sono rivelate mere illusioni.

Negli ultimi due decenni, invece di chiudere le basi militari degli Stati Uniti 
e della NATO in Europa, il continente è stato ricoperto interamente di nuove 
basi militari statunitensi in Bulgaria, Romania, Polonia e Stati baltici. Di 
conseguenza ci sono oggi più basi militari statunitensi in Europa, che nella 
prima guerra fredda. La pace e la sicurezza sono diventate più fragili e la 
qualità della vita è stata messa a repentaglio.

Questo pericoloso sviluppo è stato avviato nel 1999 dall'aggressione NATO-USA 
contro la Serbia (FR Jugoslavia). Alla fine dell'aggressione, una base militare 
statunitense, si stabilì nella parte occupata del territorio serbo di Kosovo e 
Metohija, chiamata Bondsteel, che è una delle basi militari USA più costose e 
più grandi fondata dai tempi della guerra del Vietnam. Non era solo un atto 
illegale, ma brutale, di mancanza di rispetto della sovranità e dell'integrità 
territoriale della Serbia e degli altri principi basilari del diritto 
internazionale. Ora, c'è anche un piano per espandere la base Bondsteel 
trasformandola in una posizione permanente di truppe americane e un snodo della 
presenza militare degli Stati Uniti nel Sud-Est Europa per scopi geostrategici 
e di confini.

Chiediamo che la base militare di Bondsteel sia chiusa così come tutte le altre 
basi militari statunitensi in Europa e nel mondo. I preparativi per favorire lo 
scontro e le nuove guerre sono sprechi di denaro, energia e opportunità di 
sviluppo.

Il Forum di Belgrado come parte integrante del movimento per la pace mondiale, 
sostiene fermamente l'iniziativa di chiudere tutte le basi militari nel mondo e 
riorientare le risorse per soddisfare le crescenti esigenze di sviluppo e i 
popoli che desiderano una vita migliore.

IL FORUM BELGRADO PER UN MONDO DI UGUALI

Belgrado, gennaio 2018

Traduzione a cura di Forum Belgrado Italia
http://www.civg.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1225:kosovo-chiudere-camp-bondsteel&catid=2:non-categorizzato


=== 2 ===

http://www.eurasiareview.com/03092015-illegal-occupation-of-southern-serbia-kosovo-analysis/
 
<http://www.eurasiareview.com/03092015-illegal-occupation-of-southern-serbia-kosovo-analysis/>

Illegal Occupation Of Southern Serbia: Kosovo – Analysis

By SAAG <http://www.eurasiareview.com/author/saag/> [South Asia Analysis Group]

Thursday, September 3rd, 2015


By Dr. Parasaran Rangarajan*

Serbia today is a member-State of United Nations (U.N.), after the Socialist 
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was split into several nations during the early 
1990’s when war broke out between Serbian General Milosevic and neighboring 
nations. After partition, Serbia is still the most powerful “state” of the 
former Yugoslavia.

“Kosovo”, the term used for the territory of southern Serbia, is de-jure 
recognised as a “state” by over 110+ “states”, but is not a “state” itself, as 
per the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), and is 
not a “state” at the U.N. where 2/3rd positive vote is required by the U.N. 
General Assembly for “statehood”.

Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States 
(1933) requires that a “state” must have the “capacity to enter into relations 
with other states” and be a “government”. The entity of the self-termed 
“government of Kosovo” has neither. The “Declaration of Independence” of 
“Kosovo” was upheld by an “advisory opinion” at the International Court of 
Justice (ICJ) in 2010, but an ICJ “advisory opinion” is not legally binding 
upon any member-State.

ICJ “advisory opinion” on “Kosovo” expressly states that the Court has not made 
any determination on whether “Kosovo” is a “state”, within the definition of 
international law or at the U.N., as stated in paragraphs 49-56 of the ICJ 
advisory opinion.

Furthermore, a “Declaration of Independence” does not mean that the entity has 
legal rights to exercise control over the territory it claims or even the 
self-termed “Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan”, or the Afghan Taliban’s 
“Declaration of Independence” would be valid for control of the nation today, 
since the U.N. General Assembly passed a resolution to assist the Afghan 
Taliban in 1992, for state-building, when they were controlling Afghanistan.

Since “Kosovo” is not a “state” at the U.N. as it does not have the required 
2/3rd majority diplomatic recognition, it is in direct violation of Article 49 
of the Fourth Geneva Conventions (1949), Article 8 (b) (viii) of the Rome 
Statute (2002), as well as Article 85 (4) of the Additional Protocol I (1977) 
since Serbia is a “state” and “Kosovo” is conducting:

“The transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its 
own civilian population into the territory it occupies, or the deportation or 
transfer of all or parts of the population of the occupied territory within or 
outside this territory”

Therefore, the self-termed “government of Kosovo” is not a “government” for the 
purpose of being a “state” as per the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and 
Duties of States (1933), but an “Occupying power” of Serbia. The entity of 
“Kosovo” does not have the “capacity to enter into relations with other states” 
as only “governments” do, in most cases.

Key word here proving that “Kosovo” does not meet the qualifications for a 
“state” as per the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States 
(1933), as mentioned in Article 1 is it mentions “other states”, implying that 
“Kosovo” must be a “state” itself to enter into relations with “other states”.

“Kosovo” is not allowed to sign any international treaties and conventions, due 
to the fact that an entity needs to be a “state”, so they have not even signed 
the Geneva Conventions (1949); one of the most basic conventions of 
international law, since it is based on many other conventions which preceded 
in relation to international humanitarian law (IHL) from the 1800’s.

Nevertheless, the entity of “Kosovo” was established by a U.N. Military 
Observers including the U.N. Protection Force (UNPROFOR) in 1991, U.N. 
Transitional Administration for Eastern Slavonia, Baranja and Western Sirmium 
(UNTAES), etc, which were tasked with restoring peace, as well as law and 
order, without hindering “political independence” in the former Yugoslavia.

The principle of “political independence” was mentioned in one of the first 
U.N. Peacekeeping Resolutions in 1991 for the former Yugoslavia, as the U.N. 
Security Council Resolution which “dispatched small group of personnel 
(Croatia)” stated that:

“…the people of peoples of Yugoslavia to decide upon and to construct their 
future Yugoslavia, in liaison with the International Committee of the Red 
Cross”.”

The Geneva Conventions (1949) were in large, drafted by members of the 
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), which “Kosovo” is not a 
signatory to, as it cannot sign without “statehood”.

Since Serbia is a member-State of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and 
“Kosovo” is not a “state”, as per international law; Serbia may file a 
complaint against the “Occupying power” of “Kosovo” by a “Referral of a 
situation by a State Party” allowed via Article 14 of the Rome Statute (2002), 
referring to the “situation” of the war crime of illegal occupation of southern 
Serbia.

The war crime of illegal occupation is being aided and abetted, in violation of 
Article 25 of the Rome Statute (2002), by the military alliance of the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) division for “Kosovo”, also committing 
the “crime of aggression” since it does not have any U.N. Authorisation to be 
in Serbia.

This division is called “NATO-KFOR”, which is composed of mostly of United 
States (U.S.) Armed Forces which are to be prosecuted in an International 
Criminal Tribunal for the United States of America for crimes against humanity, 
war crimes, violations of the Geneva Convention on the Prevention and 
Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948), violation of the Chemical Weapons 
Convention (1997), as well as other serious violations of international law in 
the near future, as it committed these violations on its own territory as well 
as territories of many other nations, and where Israel, Canada, including 
nations are complicit in these violations.

Despite the fact that the ICC has jurisdiction on crimes from 2002 onwards, the 
bombings by NATO in the 1990’s against civilian targets are not to be taken 
lightly and can be introduced as evidence, if it is relevant to NATO-KFOR’s war 
crimes in Serbia today.

Serbia also has the option of charging these individuals at the International 
Court of Justice (ICJ), which is not a criminal court to issue arrest warrants, 
but can issue an order for the illegal war criminals of the war criminal entity 
of the “government of Kosovo”, the Occupying power, to evacuate the war 
criminal entity of the “government of Kosovo” of what is considered Serbia for 
all legal purposes.

This is a comparatively easy case, since the area “Kosovo” is claiming, is 
still part of southern Serbia. In addition, “Kosovo” has self-admitted to 
committing “crimes against humanity” as part of an “ethnic cleansing” campaign 
of Serbians, so many of the belligerent “Kosovo Liberation Army” officials are 
to face trial in a European Union (E.U.) Tribunal for the same.

Self-admission of “ethnic cleansing” by “Kosovo” only leads us to the human 
rights violations being committed in southern Serbia today, such as the 
continuing of the “genocide” against Serbians since there are attacks including 
disappearances with “discriminatory intent” against Serbians by this war 
criminal entity; which Serbia can also prosecute at the ICC, as documented by 
human rights organisations such as Amnesty International.

“Discriminatory intent” is the main criteria distinguishing “crimes against 
humanity” from “genocide”, and this mens rea or mindstate is easier to prove 
when there is continuing occurrences of these crimes, especially if it is part 
of a “policy”.

The ICC is “complimentary” to other national courts, so cases can proceed 
against this entity at the European Courts and the ICC at the same time, for 
the same crimes, such as the “ethnic cleansing” against Serbians; a 
watered-down term for “genocide” against Serbians, for which a case can be made 
for, against “Kosovo”, at the ICC.

Kosovo is not depicted as a separate “state” on the U.N. World Map (Today), 
issued by the U.N. Secretariat, nor the U.N. Educational, Scientific, and 
Cultural Organisation (UNESCO)’s yearly “World Heritage Maps”. Since Kosovo is 
not a “state” under international law, “Kosovo” is an Occupying power, 
committing the war crime of illegal occupation against a “state”; Serbia, as 
per international law.

Superpower alliance of BRICS (Brasil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) 
and most of its allies do not recognise this war criminal entity.

Despite the fact it is the prerogative of states to recognise other states, it 
can be argued that the “other states” that have recognised this illegal war 
criminal entity, have done so under false pretext, thinking it was a “state” as 
per the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933).

Once there is “knowledge”, as stated in the Rome Statute (2002), of a war 
crime, those who continue to supply arms or defence equipment, etc, are “aiding 
and abetting” those war crimes so therefore; can be held for complicity for the 
same crime as per Article 25 of the Rome Statute (2002).

Those who recognise “Kosovo” as a separate entity can also be held accountable 
under Article 25 (3) (d) (i) (ii) since recognition can be considered as an act 
to:

Be made with the aim of furthering the criminal activity or criminal purpose of 
the group, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of a crime 
within the jurisdiction of the Court;
Be made in the knowledge of the intention of the group to commit the crime;
The presence of NATO-KFOR in “Kosovo”, which consists of mostly U.S. Armed 
Forces, with the knowledge war crimes are occurring, makes the contingent 
complicit if it goes to trial at the ICC.

“Kosovo” is a rouge regime committing the war crime of illegal occupation can 
be prosecuted at the ICC, and should be brought to the attention of the public 
as well as the concerned, so no further recognitions or aid can be given to the 
war criminals; “the government of Kosovo” and “NATO-KFOR”, in the absence of 
any legal authorisation from the U.N. or a bi-lateral treaty with the “state”, 
which is required to be in southern Serbia, as per international law.

These persons will not be able to travel to any other member-State of the ICC, 
which is most of Europe, South America, and Africa, or they will be arrested 
for extradition, for prosecution at the ICC.

The E.U. insisting on Serbia recognising Kosovo as a separate “state”, as a 
pre-condition for membership, will have to retract this pre-condition, as it is 
requesting Serbia to recognise war criminals.

If this “situation” is referred to the ICC, Serbia will be able to regain its 
land back, hold war criminals accountable for serious violations of 
international human rights law against Serbians, and join the E.U. on new terms.


*Dr. Parasaran Rangarajan is the President of the South Asian Association for 
Regional Cooperation in Law’s Mission to the United Nations (SAARCLAW-UN). 
First President in history representing the governments of 9 nations in South 
Asia — 30% of the world’s population — in international law and to the United 
Nations. Counsellor [Sixth Committee] for the Permanent Mission of India to the 
United Nations, Consultant for SAAG, Editor-in-chief for the International Law 
Journal of London.


=== 3 ===

http://www.globalresearch.ca/we-have-the-right-to-live-natos-war-on-yugoslavia-and-the-expulsion-of-serbs-from-kosovo/5472913
 
<http://www.globalresearch.ca/we-have-the-right-to-live-natos-war-on-yugoslavia-and-the-expulsion-of-serbs-from-kosovo/5472913>

“We Have the Right to Live”: NATO’s War on Yugoslavia and the Expulsion of 
Serbs from Kosovo

Sixteenth Anniversary of the NATO Attack

By Gregory Elich
Global Research, August 31, 2015

In the period before the 1999 NATO attack on Yugoslavia, the Kosovo Liberation 
Army (KLA) waged a campaign to secede and establish an independent Kosovo 
dominated by Albanians and purged of every other ethnic group. In October 1998, 
KLA spokesman Bardhyl Mahmuti spelled the KLA’s vision: “We will never change 
our position. The independence of Kosovo is the only solution…We cannot live 
together [with Serbs]. That is excluded.”

Once NATO’s war came to an end, the KLA set about driving out of Kosovo every 
non-Albanian and every pro-Yugoslav Albanian it could lay its hands on. The KLA 
left in its wake thousands of looted and burning homes, and the dead and dying.

Two months after the end of the war, I visited Hotel Belgrade, located on Mt. 
Avala, a short distance outside of Belgrade. Those who had been driven from 
their homes in Kosovo were housed in hotels throughout Yugoslavia, and in this 
one lived Serbian refugees.

The moment I entered the hotel, the sense of misery overwhelmed me. Children 
were crying, and the rooms were packed with people. The two delegation members 
who accompanied me and I were shown all three floors, and the anger among the 
refugees was so palpable I felt I could reach out in the air and touch it. 
Nearly everyone here had a loved one who had been killed by the Kosovo 
Liberation Army. All had lost their homes and everything they owned.

Initially, many of them refused to talk with us, and one refugee demanded of me 
in a mocking tone, “Can you get my home back?” It was not until a while later 
that we discovered that due to a misunderstanding, some of the refugees thought 
the NATO commander of the attack on Yugoslavia, Wesley Clark, had sent us 
there. We were quick to correct that misapprehension, and then people were more 
inclined to talk with us. There was still, however, some residual reluctance 
based on three prior experiences these refugees had with Western visitors, all 
of whom had treated them with arrogance and contempt. A reporter from the 
Washington Post was said to have been particularly abusive and insulting.

Several refugees were too upset to talk. The eyes of one woman and her son 
still haunt me. I could see everything in their eyes – all that they had 
suffered.

We climbed the stairs to the third floor and began our interviews there. A 
family of seven people were crowded into the first room we stopped at. We were 
told that five of them slept at night on the two beds, and the other two on the 
floor. Goran Djordjevich told us his family left Kosovo on June 13. “We had to 
leave because of the bandits. They threatened to kill us, so we had to leave. 
The moment NATO came we knew that we would have to leave.” After having talked 
with Roma and pro-Yugoslav Albanian refugees on earlier occasions, his family’s 
story was a familiar one to us by now, in that threats from KLA soldiers had 
prompted a hasty departure.

“We not only had a house, but also our farm and our property,” Djordjevich 
continued. “We just let the cattle free and we fled. I drove the tractor from 
our village to Belgrade for four nights and five days. When our army withdrew 
and NATO came in, we followed the army. You know, the Albanian bandits were 
there all the time in the surrounding forest and the moment NATO advanced, they 
just joined them and started terrorizing us. They were shooting at us but we 
were the lucky ones because we were with the army; so we were safer, but the 
ones who left later were in jeopardy. Very soon after we left our house they 
came to the village and burned the whole village, razing it to the ground. They 
were firing and burning everything.”

One young man who appeared to be about twenty years-old would not give his 
name, but spoke to us in halting English. “The American leader is very bad. He 
killed too many children. Too many bombs. Too many old men... He’s guilty for 
too much death. I was in Kosovo when the American Air Force bombed and killed 
our children. They wanted to kill our children; not just our soldiers. They 
wanted to kill our people. For them it was just a game”

The young man witnessed a startling development when he encountered NATO’s 
Kosovo Force (KFOR). “When our soldiers, our boys, started to withdraw from 
Kosovo, KFOR came in. The first soldiers were American soldiers and German 
soldiers. They took the weapons from the Serbian people, and in front of our 
eyes, gave them to the Albanian people to kill the Serbian people. We saw 
that.” I asked, “You saw KFOR turning arms over to the KLA?” The youth replied, 
“Yes. And giving them to KLA terrorists.”

At the end of the hall, a family of eight was packed into a single room, their 
mattresses arranged side-by-side from one end of the room to the other. An 
eighty year-old man reclined on a mattress, his cane nearby. His silence 
conveyed an aura of deep sorrow. Mitra Dragutinovich said they left Kosovo on 
June 11. “We knew that the moment the army left Kosovo, then the KLA would take 
over. The terrorists started threatening, killing, and shooting. Many people 
were wounded. Our cousin is a pediatrician, and an Albanian woman came to his 
office with a child and took a gun from her trousers and wounded him, He lost a 
kidney. Pointing to the eighty year-old man, she said, “The pediatrician who 
was wounded is his grandson.”

A woman approached, and with rising emotion addressed us in a sharp tone. “Why 
did the Americans and the Germans come? Why did they come? Did they come to 
protect us, or did they come to massacre us, to drive us from our homes, to 
violate our women, and to kill our children? I can’t believe that someone who 
had first bombed you for three months, every day and for 24 hours, that after 
that he will come to protect you. I wonder how [US President] Clinton can’t be 
sorry for the children at least. Are there children in your country? Does he 
know what it means to be a child? You know, we could retaliate. We could also 
organize terrorist actions and kill your children in the United States. But we 
are people with a soul. We would never, never, do that to any American child, 
because we are people with a soul.”

I asked what life had been like in her village during the bombing, and she 
answered, “It was awful. We were frightened. We were in our country. We were on 
our soil. But now, we are no longer on our soil, because we are occupied down 
there. Whoever they are, be they Americans, British, Germans, French, let them 
take care of their own problems at home and we shall deal with our problems 
here, in our country, because this is our country...”

We returned to the first floor, where we found a small crowd gathered in the 
lobby. Nikola Cheko was from Velika Hocha, near Orahovac. He had a strikingly 
expressive manner of speaking that I found quite moving, injecting each word 
with intense and sincere feeling. “We were surrounded from the very beginning 
of the aggression on March 24. We were surrounded by the Albanians. No 
electricity. No water. No bread. None of the conditions necessary for life. No 
one is taking care of us. KFOR: Nothing! They couldn’t care less for poor 
Serbs. They think we are stupid farmers; we’ll survive somehow and no one needs 
us, so KFOR simply forgets us. It’s a shame. It’s a shame for KFOR, for the 
United States, for Great Britain, for France, for Germany, for NATO, and all 
the big powers of the world. We are all human beings. We have the right to 
live. The nationality, the race and the religion are not important at all. A 
human being should first be a human being. A true human being is the one who is 
ready to help the victim in need. I think that KFOR should open its eyes and 
see what’s going on down there and behave according to Resolution 1244 and the 
documents signed by our Yugoslav representatives and the UN representatives in 
Kumanovo. In Kosovo, it’s not only Velika Hocha that is in trouble. There are 
many, many villages where people are absolutely in great need and dying. It’s 
high time that we become human beings and behave like human beings in the first 
place.”

Emotions in the room were running quite high and it took considerable prodding 
and encouragement to get anyone else to talk. My entreaties were met with 
silent rejection and it was at this point that our translator discovered that 
everyone thought that NATO general Wesley Clark had sent us. Once our 
translator cleared up that matter, the people were still disinclined to speak.

A woman in her thirties shouted out, “I don’t want to talk because no one will 
help. Two of my brothers have been kidnapped.” It was an opening, and I 
explained that the American people were unaware of what was happening, and that 
is why we wanted these interviews. Her name was Biljana Lazich, from Sopin, and 
pretty soon she began to talk more freely. “You know, we are all dressed in 
black [for mourning]. When Kosovo was part of Serbia and when our army was 
there, the KLA took my brothers prisoner. They were farmers and they were 
kidnapped from their homes. We didn’t hear anything from them for a whole year. 
My mother did everything possible and impossible, through the tracing service 
of the Yugoslav Red Cross and International Red Cross. The International Red 
Cross informed us that my brothers were alive and that they would be exchanged. 
It was in July last year, ten days after they had been taken prisoner.”

But nothing happened. Months passed and one day Lazich’s mother visited William 
Walker, who had been installed at U.S. insistence as head of the OSCE Kosovo 
Verification Mission. The ostensible purpose of the OSCE mission was to reduce 
the level of conflict between the Yugoslav security forces and the KLA, but the 
signed agreement applied only to Yugoslavia. The KLA was not part of the 
agreement, and was free to run wild. Walker packed the mission with CIA agents, 
who were busy marking targets for the impending NATO attack and providing 
military training to the KLA. Shortly before departing Kosovo, they handed 
communications and satellite global positioning equipment to the KLA.

Walker was unresponsive to the pleas, Biljana Lazich told us, and “didn’t say 
anything.” He was just “beating around the bush,” and “nothing happened.”

Life during the bombing was “awful, awful,” she continued. “We were frightened, 
both of the bombs coming from the sky and of the KLA. Before the war and the 
bombing, we had good relations with our neighbors. But when the bombing 
started, we knew what was in store for us, because we knew the intent of the 
KLA. We were afraid of the KLA and we wouldn’t allow our kids to leave our 
houses. They were all locked inside. We didn’t allow the children to play 
outside at all. We were particularly afraid for the children. The situation was 
unbearable! We had to flee, to save the children at least.”

Lazich introduced her mother-in-law, Dobrila Lazich, who told us what the KLA 
had done to her brother’s 13-year-old son in September 1998. The boy “came to 
see his relatives. First, he came to see one aunt and uncle and then he went to 
visit the other aunt and uncle, and between the two houses he was kidnapped and 
killed.” The boy’s mother was reluctant to talk to us, but her relatives pushed 
her forward and she spoke in a barely audible voice. Her name was Stana Antich 
and she told us how she sought help from William Walker, but he would not do 
anything.

At this point, Biljana stepped forward and interjected, “The boy was only 
13-years-old. How could he be guilty to anyone? He’s just 13. I have a 
brother-in-law who was beaten to death, in Dragobilje.” The OSCE Kosovo 
Verification Mission “knew they were taken prisoner and they communicated to us 
that they were alive and well, but finally we got their dead bodies.” A third 
man “was returned alive, but unconscious and very severely beaten.”

Despite some honest members, as a general rule nothing could have been expected 
from the leadership of an OSCE mission that was riddled with CIA agents. I 
asked the question that I already could guess the answer to. What did the OSCE 
Verification mission do in response to these murders? “Nothing,” Biljana 
responded. “Nothing. They were just sitting idle, waiting for them to beat them 
to death. They didn’t intervene. They didn’t come to help us. They just came to 
help the KLA.” Biljana spoke of how people disappeared or were killed outright. 
“The whole world knew that, but no one wanted to condemn the KLA for these 
crimes. They put all blame on the Serbian police, constantly accusing them of 
persecuting the Albanians.”

Dostena Filipovich appeared to be in her sixties and wore a scarf over her 
head. She told us how she had sent her three children out of Kosovo to ensure 
their safety. “My husband and I, as elderly people, stayed back to protect and 
defend the house. Since there were few Serbs who stayed behind in our village, 
some Albanians started molesting us, threatening and firing guns in front of 
our windows, so we decided to leave our village. We took only hand luggage and 
our cow and went to a neighboring village. We have only what we are wearing. We 
had a lot of poultry. We had a lot of cattle. We didn’t let them loose. We just 
locked them in the stable and the chicken coop, expecting to return. You 
remember I said that we decided to go to another Serbian village, but when we 
arrived there, the people were also fleeing. Since the roads were jammed, we 
couldn’t move fast and we wanted to go to Brecovica but the roads were so 
jammed we couldn’t move from Prizren. Even though KFOR was in Prizren, the KLA 
attacked us in Prizren, firing on our column.” I asked, “And KFOR did nothing?” 
The tone of Filopovich’s response indicated that she was still astonished to 
that day. “Nothing! Nothing! Just watching and laughing, watching and laughing.”

The column of refugees eventually made their way to another Serbian village to 
stay overnight, but at 3:00 AM they heard gunfire in the surrounding area and 
decided to leave. They arrived at another village, populated by both Serbs and 
Albanians. “When we arrived in that village, three KLA soldiers wearing 
different colors of caps came, together with KFOR.” Nevertheless, the refugees 
spent two nights in the village. “Serbs were not allowed to stand guard. Only 
local Albanians were allowed to stand guard. Then KFOR called all the Serbian 
men to surrender their weapons to KFOR. KFOR then handed all the weapons over 
to the KLA.” Once that happened, it was clear to the refugees that they would 
have to leave. “KFOR organized our column, one tank in front and the other in 
back. And then we noticed a lorry full of Albanians came. They were our 
neighbors. They smeared their faces so as not to be recognized, but we 
recognized them all the same. They wanted to plunder us. To be honest, KFOR did 
not allow them to do so. We were honest people. We didn’t have trouble with the 
neighbors. We didn’t take anything from anyone, so our consciences were quite 
clear. We thought that we should be protected, as honest people.”

First KFOR collected all out weapons, so we were easy prey. Before my eyes, the 
KLA killed my uncle... Actually, they slaughtered him with an axe and left his 
body. They didn’t bury him. They cut him into pieces. KFOR simply doesn’t 
prevent the KLA from doing anything. They can do anything. They just simply sit 
and watch and do nothing. We were not allowed to protect ourselves. We were 
driven out of our own homes. We were unarmed. We were at the mercy of the KLA 
terrorists. They had support from KFOR. They gave them arms. They took the arms 
from us. We left our homes with our naked souls and nothing else.

I asked if anyone else would like to be interviewed and all declined. There was 
a young girl in the room, aged around 12 or 13. A couple of people told me that 
the KLA had murdered her father. Several people encouraged her to talk but she 
vigorously shook her head no. They asked the girl again, and she broke into 
tears. With a loud, heart-rending sob, she spun around and fled down the 
hallway, leaving behind her a trail of echoing cries. Shaken, I stood there in 
silent contemplation when someone jarred me back to awareness by asking if I 
wanted the girl brought back. I could not inflict that on her and said no.

Bozhe Antich was sitting on a folding chair. Before he uttered a word, one 
could sense that terrible things had happened to him. He spoke out, “I have 
experienced a great tragedy.” We walked over to listen to his story. “It’s 
difficult for me to talk. I am from the village of Sopin, in the municipality 
of Suva Reka. The KLA killed my brother’s son. He was 42 years old. They killed 
him because he was a Serb. They killed my best friend, a mechanic. His name is 
Ranchel Antich, from Ljeshane village. They also killed Dr. Boban Vuksanovich, 
director of the health center in Suva Reka. They also killed my 
daughter-in-law’s brother, 32-years-old, just because he was a Serb. He was 
killed 200 meters from his home. They were not in politics. They were ordinary 
workers, mechanics. They went to the monastery to repair a machine there, and 
the road was bombed. They were on the way to the Holy Trinity Monastery, a very 
old monastery from the 14th century. They left Suva Reka, on the way to repair 
the machine. It’s four kilometers from Suva Reka. The KLA ambushed them, first 
killing the driver of the car. Then they pushed the car down over a cliff. 
Several of the passengers in the car were wounded. The terrorists were not 
satisfied with killing the driver, the doctor and my cousin. They wanted to 
kill everyone in the car. So when the car came to a stop at the bottom of the 
hill, they followed the car and killed my other nephew with sixteen bullets in 
his body.”

This incident took place during the NATO war. Not long after the murders 
occurred, a criminal investigator visited the site and KLA soldiers killed him, 
too. The Holy Trinity Monastery, where Antich’s friends and family were headed 
the day they were killed, also met a sad fate. When KFOR entered Kosovo in 
mid-June 1999, KLA soldiers looted and burned the monastery, and the next month 
they returned and demolished it with explosives. The Holy Trinity Monastery was 
one of 84 churches and monasteries the KLA destroyed during its rampage in the 
first few months under the protective wing of NATO. Many of the buildings dated 
back to the Middle Ages, and some were designated by UNESCO as world historic 
sites. KFOR would eventually place under guard some of the more historic sites 
that had managed to survive, but the demolition of religious sites nevertheless 
continued on a sporadic basis. In March 2004, Albanian extremists launched a 
new pogrom, killing, beating and driving away Serbs and setting their homes 
ablaze. During those attacks, another 35 churches and monasteries were 
destroyed or damaged.

“We can’t go back as long as the KLA has KFOR protection, a shield for their 
murderous activities,” Bozhe Antich explained. “If someone is human, he should 
at least be sorry for the little children who have been murdered. Because all 
the children of this world are children in the first place, regardless of their 
religion, race, and ethnic origin. What is the future of our children now? They 
have no homes. They have no schools for now. We were not poor people. We had 
our property down there. We had houses. We had land. For example, in my case, I 
worked for 33 years. Now, I am a beggar. I have nothing. Our country, Serbia, 
is in deep economic crisis. Serbia cannot help. What is our future? All those 
supporting these criminal activities, committed by Albanian terrorists, should 
face the truth and see in us human beings, because we are human beings.”

Sava Jovanovich presented photographs of his demolished home in Kosovo. 
Scrawled on one wall was ‘UCK’, the initials for ‘KLA’ in the Albanian 
language. Another graffiti message read, “Return of Serbs prohibited.” 
Jovanovich and his four brothers lived in houses that were next to each other. 
They left Kosovo on June 11 and 12. “It was an exodus,” Sava recalled. “My 
father decided to protect the houses. I asked about my father, and they told 
me, “We don’t know anything. We have no news from him. We don’t know.” The KLA 
“took everything, all the wheat, and then they burned down the granary. They 
also plundered the wheat and corn from my brothers’ property and then burned 
down the building. We had about 15 cows, 20 pigs, and lots of poultry, and now 
we have nothing.”

The lack of news of his father’s fate distressed him, and he blamed Western 
intervention for the tragedy that had befallen his family. “My father remembers 
the stories from his grandfather, from the time when he lived while the region 
was still under the Ottoman Empire. And my father lived under German occupation 
during the [Second] World War. They didn’t have to leave their homes. Now is 
the first time we were forced to leave. It is worse than under the Ottomans and 
the Germans.”

I mentioned to him that U.S. officials were saying that members of the KLA 
could join the new police force being established in Kosovo. Jovanovich was 
startled. “This is impossible, because they hate the Serbs and they are against 
the Serbs. This is not possible.” But that is precisely what happened, as KLA 
soldiers filled the ranks of the newly formed police force in NATO-occupied 
Kosovo.

About one month after I returned to the United States, I read an article from 
the Yugoslav press. A reporter had interviewed many of the same refugees at Mt. 
Avala, including Sava Jovanovich. In the intervening time, Jovanovich had 
finally received news of his father. “I heard that Albanian robbers hanged my 
father, who didn’t want to leave, at his doorstep.”


Gregory Elich is on the Board of Directors of the Jasenovac Research Institute 
and the Advisory Board of the Korea Policy Institute. He is a columnist for 
Voice of the People <http://www.vop.co.kr/>, and one of the co-authors of 
Killing Democracy: CIA and Pentagon Operations in the Post-Soviet Period 
<http://www.invissin.ru/books/MURDER_DEMOCRACY_operation_CIA_post_Soviet_period/>,
 published in the Russian language.



Rispondere a