James/Scott/Pat? Long term goal is to sync with whatever is latest stable before release, no?
Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 23, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I am dismayed to see that juju 1.17.0 was put into trusty. We know it > is not backward compatible. Since the juju stable PPA only contains > backports from trusty, there is no juju stable package for me to > install through an archive. > > A sad day for me to respond to a production-level issue with > production/stable jujus. > > I am happy to run trusty and test the new packaging of stable > software. Juju 1.17.0 is not stable, it is not compatible with 1.16.x, > and was not given a choice, nor informed that I could be risking > someone's assets. I don't think ubuntu devel series should be getting > devel juju, at least not until we have full devel to stable > compatibility testing. > > If we put juju into trusty because everyone on trusty myst test juju, > then we need to offer out testers an obvious and safe path to remain > stable, I don't think pinning juju packages is obvious or right > because I do want stable packages. We can offer stable and unstable > versions in trusty. > > For the time being, I am going to create a stable trusty juju and > place it in the stable ppa so that some people have a choice to > respond to production situations. > > -- > Curtis Hovey > Canonical Cloud Development and Operations > http://launchpad.net/~sinzui > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev -- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
