On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:09 AM, roger peppe <roger.pe...@canonical.com> wrote: > I had assumed that because every client needs to see every transaction > there would likely be no benefit to sharding the log, although > technically you could shard on transaction id. I'd be
Clients don't need to see every transaction. Only those that affect the documents they are acting on. > Thanks for pointing this out. If we manage to hugely scale juju using mongodb > I will be very happy. I still think we should do some measurements to > convince us that we actually have some hope of doing so though. > My own measurements left me less than convinced of the > possibility, although it's been a while since I did them. When you measured a sharded setup, what was the outcome? gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
