On 21/08/14 02:50, Nate Finch wrote: > I would expect a lot of people will implement their charms as a single > script (especially given the number of charms we've seen implemented > that way even with minimal support for it). If the special hook file is > called "default-hook", it makes those single-script charms seem like > less of a hack than if the single file is called "missing-hook". It > would also makes more sense to a new charm author, I think.
+1 to default-hook -1 to missing-hook As Aaron mentioned, it isn't missing if it is there. I agree that default-hook is more likely to make sense to newcomers. Tim -- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
