On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Menno Smits <menno.sm...@canonical.com> wrote: > Thanks Eric! I've used Reviewboard at a previous job and I'm fairly sure > that it aligns better with the way the Juju Core team likes to work than > Github's review features. > > Two questions: > > 1. Is this what we're supposed to be doing from right now?
Nope. I'm hopeful that we will switch over to reviewboard in a week or two. Until then github is still our review tool. However, in the meantime feel free to try out the Reviewboard-oriented workflow as well. :) > > 2. I'm pretty sure some configuration of the rbt tool is required so that it > knows how to talk to the Reviewboard server. Is there a config file > available? The first time in a repo you run "rbt setup-repo" which generates a user-agnostic, repo-specific .reviewboardrc file. I expect that before long we will commit that file in each of our repos. Once that happens, no one will have to do anything special (e.g. run rbt setup-repo) any longer. See https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/rbtools/dev/rbt/configuration/ -eric -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
