juju-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Unable to kill-controller Cheryl Jennings
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Aaron Bentley
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Rick Harding
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Nate Finch
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Aaron Bentley
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Rick Harding
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller John Meinel
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller roger peppe
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Aaron Bentley
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Eric Snow
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Unable to kill-controller Ian Booth
• Unable to run a charm on KVM container phani shankar
  • Re: Unable to run a charm on KVM container John Meinel
  • Re: Unable to run a charm on KVM container John Meinel
  • Re: Unable to run a charm on KVM container phani shankar
  • Re: Unable to run a charm on KVM container Andrew McDermott
• Reserved actions Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Reserved actions Marco Ceppi
  • Re: Reserved actions Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Reserved actions Rick Harding
  • Re: Reserved actions Marco Ceppi
• Merge master for your feature branches Cheryl Jennings
• Move provider implementations under their related projects. Eric Snow
  • Re: Move provider implementations under their related projects. William Reade
  • Re: Move provider implementations under their related projects. John Meinel
  • Re: Move provider implementations under their related projects. Tim Penhey
  • Re: Move provider implementations under their related projects. Andrew Wilkins
• Collection of Juju talks and presentations Jorge O. Castro
• Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Michael Hudson-Doyle
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed David Cheney
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Michael Hudson-Doyle
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Ian Booth
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Tim Penhey
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Nate Finch
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Ian Booth
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Martin Packman
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed David Cheney
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Martin Packman
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed David Cheney
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Katherine Cox-Buday
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Aaron Bentley
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Nate Finch
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Mark Ramm-Christensen (Canonical.com)
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed David Cheney
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Mark Ramm-Christensen (Canonical.com)
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Katherine Cox-Buday
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Nate Finch
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Cheryl Jennings
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Katherine Cox-Buday
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Cheryl Jennings
  • Re: Go 1.6 is now in trusty-proposed Katherine Cox-Buday
• model migration now behind a feature flag Tim Penhey
• Master is blocked in preparation for 2.0-beta3 Cheryl Jennings
  • Re: Master is blocked in preparation for 2.0-beta3 Nate Finch
  • Re: Master is blocked in preparation for 2.0-beta3 John Meinel
• model-migrations is now merged into master Tim Penhey
• Usability issues with status-history Ian Booth
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history John Meinel
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history William Reade
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history Ian Booth
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history William Reade
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history William Reade
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history Horacio Duran
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history William Reade
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history Nate Finch
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history John Meinel
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history Ian Booth
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history John Meinel
  • Re: Usability issues with status-history Stuart Bishop
• Re: Charmers application - David Ames David Britton
  • Re: Charmers application - David Ames Chris Glass
  • Re: Charmers application - David Ames James Page
  • Re: Charmers application - David Ames Marco Ceppi
  • Re: Charmers application - David Ames David Ames
• Preparing for the next beta - CI runs on feature branches Cheryl Jennings
• Re: Openstack HA Portland Meetup Present Rick Harding
• juju versions are now in github.com/juju/version Nate Finch
• Warning: test suite not actually isolated John Meinel
  • Re: Warning: test suite not actually isolated roger peppe
  • Re: Warning: test suite not actually isolated Anastasia Macmood
  • Re: Warning: test suite not actually isolated John Meinel
• PatchValue (AddCleanup) unsafe with non pointer receiver test John Meinel
  • Re: PatchValue (AddCleanup) unsafe with non pointer receiver test John Meinel
  • Re: PatchValue (AddCleanup) unsafe with non pointer receiver test John Meinel
  • Re: PatchValue (AddCleanup) unsafe with non pointer receiver test roger peppe
• Re: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe) Andrew Wilkins
  • Storage documentation (Was "Re: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe)") Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe) Stuart Bishop
  • Re: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe) Stuart Bishop
  • Re: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe) Kapil Thangavelu
  • Re: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe) roger peppe
  • Re: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe) Kapil Thangavelu
  • Re: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe) roger peppe
  • Re: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe) Eric Snow
  • Re: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe) John Meinel
  • Re: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe) Stuart Bishop
• armhfentures Martin Packman
  • Re: armhfentures John Meinel
  • Re: armhfentures Michael Hudson-Doyle
  • Re: armhfentures Curtis Hovey-Canonical
  • Re: armhfentures Andrew Wilkins
• Re: Juju devel 2.0-beta2 is available for testing Jorge O. Castro
  • Re: Juju devel 2.0-beta2 is available for testing Alexis Bruemmer
  • Re: Juju devel 2.0-beta2 is available for testing Jorge O. Castro
• old, untouched PRs Anastasia Macmood
• Do we still need juju upgrade-charm --switch ... ? Ian Booth
  • Re: Do we still need juju upgrade-charm --switch ... ? Rick Harding
  • Re: Do we still need juju upgrade-charm --switch ... ? Ian Booth
  • Re: Do we still need juju upgrade-charm --switch ... ? Marco Ceppi
  • Re: Do we still need juju upgrade-charm --switch ... ? Ian Booth
• httpbakery .Client overly restrictive on body - io.ReaderSeeker Tim Penhey
  • Re: httpbakery .Client overly restrictive on body - io.ReaderSeeker roger peppe
• Juju stable 1.25.4 is proposed for release Curtis Hovey-Canonical
  • Re: Juju stable 1.25.4 is proposed for release Alexis Bruemmer
• A Patronizing Guide to What Makes a Good Unit Test Michael Hudson-Doyle
  • Re: A Patronizing Guide to What Makes a Good Unit Test Katherine Cox-Buday
• Re: FW: Question - Creating first Charm Matt Bruzek
• Juju 2.0-beta2 update Cheryl Jennings
  • Re: Juju 2.0-beta2 update John Meinel
• Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment Ian Booth
  • Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment roger peppe
  • Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment Ian Booth
  • Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment Vasiliy Tolstov
  • Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment Rick Harding
  • Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment Marco Ceppi
  • Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment Gabriel Samfira
  • Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment Ian Booth
  • Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment Martin Packman
  • Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment Rick Harding
  • Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment Ian Booth
  • Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Ian Booth
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Rick Harding
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Ian Booth
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Rick Harding
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Rick Harding
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Ian Booth
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Ian Booth
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Rick Harding
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Ian Booth
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Antonio Rosales
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Ian Booth
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Antonio Rosales
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Rick Harding
  • Re: Charm series in bundles (Was Re: Juju 2.0 and local charm deployment) Ian Booth
• admin is dead, long live $USER Tim Penhey
  • Re: admin is dead, long live $USER Rick Harding
  • Re: admin is dead, long live $USER Tim Penhey
  • Re: admin is dead, long live $USER Ian Booth
  • Re: admin is dead, long live $USER John Meinel
  • Re: admin is dead, long live $USER Ian Booth
  • Re: admin is dead, long live $USER Tim Penhey
  • Re: admin is dead, long live $USER Andrew Wilkins
• Dependency engine in the machine agent Menno Smits
  • Re: Dependency engine in the machine agent Tim Penhey
  • Re: Dependency engine in the machine agent Menno Smits
• Extra Network Bindings for Charms John Meinel
  • Re: Extra Network Bindings for Charms Dimiter Naydenov
• model-migration: the what, why, and progress Tim Penhey
• LXD support (maybe) John Meinel
  • Re: LXD support (maybe) Andrew McDermott
  • Re: LXD support (maybe) Horacio Duran
  • Re: LXD support (maybe) Menno Smits
  • Re: LXD support (maybe) Ian Booth
  • Re: LXD support (maybe) Adam Stokes
  • Re: LXD support (maybe) Ian Booth
  • Re: LXD support (maybe) Menno Smits
  • Re: LXD support (maybe) John Meinel
  • Re: LXD support (maybe) Menno Smits
  • Re: LXD support (maybe) Ian Booth
  • Re: LXD support (maybe) James Tunnicliffe
  • Re: LXD support (maybe) Eric Snow
• Unable to Destroy Environment (2.0-alpha2) John Meinel
  • Re: Unable to Destroy Environment (2.0-alpha2) Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Unable to Destroy Environment (2.0-alpha2) Andrew Wilkins
• Diffing string checker Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Diffing string checker Horacio Duran
  • Re: Diffing string checker roger peppe
  • Re: Diffing string checker Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Diffing string checker Nate Finch
  • Re: Diffing string checker Eric Snow
  • Re: Diffing string checker Andrew Wilkins
• Please merge master into your feature branches Ian Booth
  • Re: Please merge master into your feature branches Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Please merge master into your feature branches Nate Finch
  • Re: Please merge master into your feature branches Andrew Wilkins
  • Re: Please merge master into your feature branches Katherine Cox-Buday
• Units & resources: are units homogeneous? Katherine Cox-Buday
  • Re: Units & resources: are units homogeneous? Adam Collard
  • Re: Units & resources: are units homogeneous? Katherine Cox-Buday
  • Re: Units & resources: are units homogeneous? Adam Collard
  • Re: Units & resources: are units homogeneous? Stuart Bishop
  • Re: Units & resources: are units homogeneous? John Meinel
  • Re: Units & resources: are units homogeneous? Rick Harding
• Re: Ubuntu in GSOC Rick Harding

• Earlier messages
• Later messages