I'm told that's for a network (veth nic?) performance issue? FWIW my main build+test box is running on 3.2 precise kernel with ubuntu-lxc daily ppa. overlayfs and lvm clones work perfectly out of the box, and btrfs (which i'm using now) only have the fsync performance issue, which I work around by calling all apt-get upgrades and installs using eatmydata. I don't do heavy network i/o, but apt-get's package downloads are lightning fast <shrug>.
-serge Quoting David Cheney ([email protected]): > Yes, Raring kernel or later. > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Jorge O. Castro <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://juju.ubuntu.com/docs/config-local.html > > > > When we were creating this page we were talking on how we would prefer LXC > > from the HWE stack while people are using Juju on 12.04. > > > > However Scott Moser pointed out to me[1] that Juju works on the vanilla > > 12.04 stack and that we should consider what plusses and minuses > > recommending an HWE stack to server users entails. > > > > (Note that this is only about 12.04, everyone else should be fine with newer > > versions) > > > > 1: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6324341/ > > > > -- > > Jorge Castro > > Canonical Ltd. > > http://juju.ubuntu.com/ - Automate your Cloud Infrastructure > > > > > > > > -- > > Juju mailing list > > [email protected] > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju > > > > -- > Juju mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju -- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
