-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 01/05/14 13:13, Quentin Hartman wrote: >> nova-compute should be if one of the nova network options is used >> in the nova-cloud-controller charm. I'll run this option through >> our lab again today to make sure that it is. > > Thanks again for the additional info. I'd love to hear what your > results are and appreciate you looking into it. Is there anything > that need be done to specify that other than using the flatmanager > or flatdhcpmanager options?
I ran a nova-network topology test - nova-network and nova-api services get enabled on the nova-compute nodes as spec for multi-host mode. Looking at our config we just set - FlatDHCPManager for network-manager option in the nova-cloud-controller charm. >> Note that pushing multiple charms onto the same service units >> without LXC container use is not support other than for the >> following charms - which need to not be in LXC containers: >> >> nova-compute ceph/ceph-osd swift-storage >> >> This allows you to maximise storage/compute usage in deployments >> - but it won't fit everyones requirements. > > That is the solution I hit on as well, and so will be exploring lxc > when I return to this project next week. For my purposes having > Maas, juju, and the control services for open stack on separate > boxes is wasteful. My deployment isn't large enough to need that > much hardware in the control layer. We run an internal test cloud on 6 nodes; 5 compute/ceph/swift nodes and 1 control node with everything else in LXC containers. Juju controls the creation of the lxc containers: juju deploy cinder --to lxc:0 Deploys the cinder charm to a lxc container on physical machine 0 (yes - - that is the bootstrap node :-)). We also push the quantum-gateway charm onto the bootstrap node without LXC for north/south network connectivity for instances. >> Nick, who also wrote the MAAS and Juju documentation, has been >> working on a OpenStack + Juju + MAAS guide this cycle - its in >> final review and hopefully should be out in the next couple of >> weeks. > > Is there a way I can help with and or review the wip? I'm hoping to > have this deployment in service in a couple weeks and I'm sure the > information in the guide would be quite valuable to me, even if > it's not yet perfect. Not sure - I'll let Nick answer this question. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer [email protected] [email protected] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTYkvYAAoJEL/srsug59jDXHQQAKXL9FpgdPBNK05kzdk6ZVdA FVqK/NSzLHP6MklxLfKWTNqQVbmlIrG90oSPyq1uTxMhTW32K8RMNJEtGMxq3krA 0dpsfi3JH72T+z0uObeqDdI575GHgNq1eyiHoBQlzC76GPnbj8fNtSkc9eTm1EPf Wl8DIcbUwtcbpT0aul0b3DG9Ed/j8dL54v2c6x64MahN8srdPRuwhLUQ4evyVcSN zNYznijWnV1t04PiW4a5tPI8jY2qaA7pDuPcNlJSVc0o+7UrbSRGowKwfLeS8gM/ wLZzezObZAi3jXQE4e0jG/b/A2tMqli4wZ5G4CtdR4cCapwHZi3EmAzrNmK6onFt 0ftn2nMy6xMiHq7jZ5PEG2gtr9v6/MjZd638yD66h3CxnnYXngsG5I6DvwmCl/zy IhaAdkyO2+cEMYXPMAWcTnu5FGmtJB6yZkczJuDFt0V+J8uCWWe1nLKQ0/L7pefl QeZ4eafCWEmGQk9dUa8spLXAbUYhB3t1q63WtL0cFYpN992XMXWb4j+1wE1sK7dz fNhiCEHx5MG5uM/u5xOsvAC8nlcT+a4Ty02Gh2o5xt21pUY+qMSP+iD8uXJ4ml2O P/sVoQAEOn4Uz363wWNk9dEVb878C3bEByXhwsyo4VQ279iEiQgj+O70Fai6iaTC h2cwHUZIPUGYssPZQ0tw =G8xH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
