On Wed Dec 10 2014 at 10:28:41 AM Marco Ceppi <ma...@ondina.co> wrote:
> On Wed Dec 10 2014 at 10:26:48 AM Eric Snow <eric.s...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> I had tried the explanation route to no avail. I'll probably work up >> a demo for the specific folks I have in mind. I think juju is one of >> those things that makes more sense when you see it in action. >> >> One thought I had is that we could work up a demo-in-a-box. Either >> make a VM image available (with local provider in it?) or fix local >> provider so that it runs entirely in VMs/containers. For the latter >> we could distribute a script that spins up the new local provider to >> make it super easy for someone to try juju out locally, AKA >> juju-in-a-box. >> > > We have most of this already, we spin vagrant images that have the local > provider installed, configured, and bootstrapped on vagrant up > Forgot the link! https://juju.ubuntu.com/docs/config-vagrant.html > >> -eric >> >> -- >> Juju mailing list >> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm >> an/listinfo/juju >> >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
