Would it not be better for the charm to have a path the client can `wget` the libraries from - this path can be sent via the relation as a string
Matty On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:30 PM, José Antonio Rey <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > One of the options would be to cat the file as a string and pass that > string over the connection, finally echoing that string to foo.binary. > > What do others think? > > -- > José Antonio Rey > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016, 08:25 Merlijn Sebrechts <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> >> I have a question I'd like to discuss, if you guys aren't to busy >> prepping for Ubucon.. :) >> >> I've found a number of Java projects where, in order to communicate for >> example with Kafka, they require the Kafka Java libraries for that specific >> version. For the moment, I solve this by downloading the libraries from a >> deployed Kafka installation and include them in the Charm. However, this >> has the disadvantage that everytime the Kafka charm version changes, I have >> to update the libraries in all the charms that connect to Kafka. It would >> be better if there was a way to send these libraries over the connection. >> This way, a Charm that can connect to one version of Kafka has a very high >> chance of being able to connect to the next version. >> >> So my question is: Is there a way to send large binary files between >> Charms? Or is this problem better solved by using a subordinate >> kafka-plugin Charm like the Hadoop Charms do? >> >> >> >> Kind regards >> Merlijn Sebrechts >> -- >> Juju mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >> > > -- > Juju mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju > >
-- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
