It seems rssh might be able to do this! 2016-01-20 16:25 GMT+01:00 Merlijn Sebrechts <[email protected]>:
> I like the idea of rsync. Is there a way to restrict access to a single > file on the rsync server? > > 2016-01-20 16:16 GMT+01:00 Marco Ceppi <[email protected]>: > >> I don't think sending the binary via relation is a good idea. Either >> spinning up a web service or using rsync would be a better bet >> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016, 10:10 AM Matthew Williams < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Would it not be better for the charm to have a path the client can >>> `wget` the libraries from - this path can be sent via the relation as a >>> string >>> >>> Matty >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:30 PM, José Antonio Rey <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> One of the options would be to cat the file as a string and pass that >>>> string over the connection, finally echoing that string to foo.binary. >>>> >>>> What do others think? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> José Antonio Rey >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016, 08:25 Merlijn Sebrechts < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have a question I'd like to discuss, if you guys aren't to busy >>>>> prepping for Ubucon.. :) >>>>> >>>>> I've found a number of Java projects where, in order to communicate >>>>> for example with Kafka, they require the Kafka Java libraries for that >>>>> specific version. For the moment, I solve this by downloading the >>>>> libraries >>>>> from a deployed Kafka installation and include them in the Charm. However, >>>>> this has the disadvantage that everytime the Kafka charm version changes, >>>>> I >>>>> have to update the libraries in all the charms that connect to Kafka. It >>>>> would be better if there was a way to send these libraries over the >>>>> connection. This way, a Charm that can connect to one version of Kafka has >>>>> a very high chance of being able to connect to the next version. >>>>> >>>>> So my question is: Is there a way to send large binary files between >>>>> Charms? Or is this problem better solved by using a subordinate >>>>> kafka-plugin Charm like the Hadoop Charms do? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards >>>>> Merlijn Sebrechts >>>>> -- >>>>> Juju mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Juju mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Juju mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >>> >> >> -- >> Juju mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >> >> >
-- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
