I am the upstream (for this charm) and this is an entire rework of the
charm including a repo change. Future mp will be against this repo
https://github.com/marcoceppi/charm-ubuntu the readme is up to date:
http://juju charms.com/u/marcoceppi/ubuntu/1

I'll have the repo fixed tomorrow.


Marco

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, 1:36 PM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beis...@canonical.com>
wrote:

> Was there a merge proposal or pull request for these changes in the
> charm's upstream repo?  If not, is there a branch that can be proposed
> against the charm repo?  Or, is there a new upstream repo for the charm?
>
> The candidate charm in the store is helpful to validate functionality, but
> as a contributor to the existing charm, I simply cannot determine where I
> might base future changes, or rebase existing works in progress.
>
> -1 to this moving forward, from an upstream charm code contributor
> perspective, pending clarification/completion of the upstream repo and
> review.
>
> Setting aside those issues of principle, I've confirmed that it does work
> with 1.25.6: Precise, Trusty, Xenial units.  Having this in place will be a
> nice touch.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ryan
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Tim Penhey <tim.pen...@canonical.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Marco,
>>
>> This is awesome. I use the ubuntu charm all the time for testing, and
>> seeing the workload version and workload status being set is pretty cool.
>>
>> I had hoped that seeing the "unknown" status would apply gentle pressure
>> to get people to set a workload status.
>>
>> Winning!!!
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On 15/09/16 08:39, Marco Ceppi wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>
>>> I have granted everyone access to the candidate channel. Could you try
>>> again?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Marco Ceppi
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:26 PM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beis...@canonical.com
>>> <mailto:ryan.beis...@canonical.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Is there a merge proposal or pull request for the changes?  I'd like
>>>     to validate with 1.25.6 as the current stable release, but --channel
>>>     isn't a thing there.
>>>
>>>     I tried to `charm pull ubuntu --channel candidate` but received:
>>>      ERROR cannot get archive: unauthorized: access denied.
>>>
>>>     Thanks,
>>>
>>>     Ryan
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Marco Ceppi
>>>     <marco.ce...@canonical.com <mailto:marco.ce...@canonical.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Hey everyone,
>>>
>>>         Normally, I wouldn't bother with an update like this, but it's
>>>         slightly larger than I'd care to just push out. Today, the
>>>         Ubuntu charm is a no-op, which is largely the goal of the charm.
>>>         However, as juju becomes more rich this no-op charm starts to
>>>         look incomplete. I know a few people depend on the Ubuntu charm
>>>         for setup purposes and testing. I'd hate to be the source of
>>>         breakage for that charm so I'm announcing an update here.
>>>
>>>         Screenshot from 2016-09-14 09-48-31.png
>>>
>>>         Other than the obvious changes to status, this also implements
>>>         workload version.
>>>
>>>         If you depend on the Ubuntu charm for anything I urge you to
>>>         test the latest version with
>>>
>>>         `juju deploy ubuntu --channel candidate`
>>>
>>>         If I don't receive any negative feedback by the end of this week
>>>         I'll move what's in candidate to stable.
>>>
>>>         Thanks,
>>>         Marco Ceppi
>>>
>>>         --
>>>         Juju mailing list
>>>         Juju@lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Juju@lists.ubuntu.com>
>>>         Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>         https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Reply via email to