Le lundi 15 août 2016 à 20:33 -0700, Matthieu a écrit : > In stata one specifies a formula without ~ or + > y x1 x2 > It works pretty well in my experience. How about dropping ~ and +? I don't find it particularly clear that in Stata the response isn't visually separated from the dependent variables. ~ is really useful IMHO.
As regards +, it's needed so that the formula is a valid Julia expression, which is good for consistency (even if formulas end up being written as strings). That convention also follows the Wilkinson & Rodgers notation, so there's a precedent in the literature other than R. Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "julia-stats" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
