My understanding (which may be out-of-date) is that the current version of map frequently doesn’t get the type of its input correct. That may have been fixed since I developed the habit of not using map.
— John On Dec 29, 2013, at 11:58 AM, andrew cooke <[email protected]> wrote: > From the comment at https://gist.github.com/nalimilan/8132114 > (am I reading it wrong, does it just mean map with local anon functions?) > > Is it the overhead of creating an intermediate Task? Are there any plans to > merge nested tasks as an optimisation (I have no idea if something like that > is even possible)? Or to replace the "collect(map(...))" idiom with > something faster? > > Thanks, > Andrew
