Errrr, make that the type of the output. map often produces Array{Any} when you
wanted something like Array{Float64}.
— John
On Dec 29, 2013, at 11:58 AM, andrew cooke <[email protected]> wrote:
> From the comment at https://gist.github.com/nalimilan/8132114
> (am I reading it wrong, does it just mean map with local anon functions?)
>
> Is it the overhead of creating an intermediate Task? Are there any plans to
> merge nested tasks as an optimisation (I have no idea if something like that
> is even possible)? Or to replace the "collect(map(...))" idiom with
> something faster?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
