Thanks for the suggestion but even with electric-indent-mode enabled the
problem persisted for me. Not sure why. Anyway, I added something to my
emacs file that gives the desired behavior, in case anyone else ever
encounters this. I added a julia-mode hook that binds the return key
locally to 'reindent-then-newline-and-indent. Like so:
(add-hook 'julia-mode-hook
(lambda ()
(local-set-key [return] 'reindent-then-newline-and-indent)
))
On Thursday, January 9, 2014 10:24:42 AM UTC-5, Michael Hatherly wrote:
>
> Have you tried enabling the built-in indentation mode
>
> M-x electric-indent-mode
>
> Without this enabled I get the same problem as you.
>
> On Wednesday, 8 January 2014 23:13:24 UTC+2, Jordan Meyer wrote:
>>
>> Anyone?
>>
>> On Monday, November 25, 2013 2:04:53 AM UTC-5, Jordan Meyer wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm just getting started with Julia, and playing around with editing
>>> scripts in julia-mode from the latest version of ESS. I'm hoping someone
>>> can explain what I'm missing with indentation here. Say I want to make an
>>> if statement. I type "if 1", then hit enter, and the new line is properly
>>> indented. But if I type "end" and press enter, the indentation of the "end"
>>> line is not automatically brought back to to the same level as the "if".
>>> This is the expected behavior in other ESS editing modes like R for
>>> example. So I thought that perhaps it would be like python's editing mode,
>>> where you can backspace out of indentation levels. But this doesn't work
>>> either. What does work is if I type "if 1 end", then move the cursor back
>>> to just before "end", then hit enter. Then "end" is properly at the same
>>> indentation level as the corresponding "if". But this situation is wholly
>>> unsatisfactory and I feel like I must be missing something obvious. Is this
>>> the case? If so, what? Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>
