Similar problem is a quite weak description.

The previous problem was that a new version of a pakcage 
(NumericExtensions) was incorrectly marked as compatible with 0.2. This 
does not appear to be fixed, so a bump on Dahua Lin and John Myles White 
might be what is needed.

kl. 21:32:14 UTC+1 torsdag 23. januar 2014 skrev Cgast følgende:
>
> Any update on this? Having similar problems on Windows 7 with a fresh 
> install just this morning.
>
> Seems to be related to some renaming of Stats vs. StatsBase? I've tried 
> fiddling with this myself within the packages, but haven't been able to 
> resolve it.
>
> Thanks in advance for all your help, and all the hard work getting Julia 
> to this point. 
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:15:55 AM UTC-8, John Myles White wrote:
>>
>> No, we'll fix the packages to indicate which work with 0.2 and which 
>> don't.
>>
>>  -- John
>>
>> On Jan 15, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Corey Sparks <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> so, if i just wait for 0.3 things might get worked out?
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:26:56 AM UTC-6, John Myles White wrote:
>>>
>>> We've unfortunately done a bad job of keeping those packages compatible 
>>> with 0.2. I'll try to fix as much as I can today.
>>>
>>>  -- John
>>>
>>> On Jan 15, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Corey Sparks <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear List,
>>> I just installed Julia 0.2.0 last night and was trying to get the GLM 
>>> package going, when I try to load it and the RDatasets packages, I get:
>>>
>>> julia> using RDatasets, GLM
>>>
>>> Warning: could not import Base.foldl into NumericExtensions
>>>
>>> Warning: could not import Base.foldr into NumericExtensions
>>>
>>> Warning: could not import Base.sum! into NumericExtensions
>>>
>>> Warning: could not import Base.maximum! into NumericExtensions
>>>
>>> Warning: could not import Base.minimum! into NumericExtensions
>>>
>>> Warning: could not import Base.PAIRWISE_SUM_BLOCKSIZE into 
>>> NumericExtensions
>>>
>>> ERROR: TernaryFunctor not defined
>>>
>>>  in include at boot.jl:238
>>>
>>>  in include_from_node1 at loading.jl:114
>>>
>>>  in include at boot.jl:238
>>>
>>>  in include_from_node1 at loading.jl:114
>>>
>>>  in reload_path at loading.jl:140
>>>
>>>  in _require at loading.jl:58
>>>
>>>  in require at loading.jl:43
>>>
>>> at /Users/ozd504/.julia/GLM/src/lm.jl:22
>>>
>>> at /Users/ozd504/.julia/GLM/src/GLM.jl:76
>>>
>>>
>>> It looks like something in GLM is broken, does anyone have advice on 
>>> this?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> Corey
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to