On Monday, June 16, 2014 12:39:39 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > We already have ifelse as the ternary function. If the function form has > different evaluation rules than the operator form, then it ought to have a > different name. >
Ok. I suppose it couldn't evaluate like the ternary operator. Well, just ignore the last statement about the ?() function. I was really just being a bit silly there, and it isn't relevant to the main of the conversation.
