I don't think you can create a Function without any methods (yet), but I think it seems like a useful thing to do.
kl. 10:50:21 UTC+2 fredag 4. juli 2014 skrev Magnus Lie Hetland følgende: > > Just a quick followup: What if identifier wasn't defined in a.jl – what > do I do then? That is, I'd like an abstract, un-implemented "template > method," sort of. There'd be no way to import it into b.jl, and therefore > no way to "inject" its definition into a namespace available to identify. > Should I explicitly implement a function that raises a "no method" error, > or something? (Or am I once again missing some basic language construct?-) >
