I've also encountered this problem and did indeed solve it by implementing a method that throws an error. But it would be nice to hear if a better, more julian, approach exists or could be made available.
Op vrijdag 4 juli 2014 10:50:21 UTC+2 schreef Magnus Lie Hetland: > > Just a quick followup: What if identifier wasn't defined in a.jl – what > do I do then? That is, I'd like an abstract, un-implemented "template > method," sort of. There'd be no way to import it into b.jl, and therefore > no way to "inject" its definition into a namespace available to identify. > Should I explicitly implement a function that raises a "no method" error, > or something? (Or am I once again missing some basic language construct?-) >
