That's because Sphinx identifies [] as optional arguments in the ..function macro-thingy, and it does funny re-arrangements with it. The source is correct; it's the output that is wrong. It's annoying, but I've not dug into Sphinx enough to determine how we might disable it.
On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 10:24:01 AM UTC-4, John Myles White wrote: > > Yeah, that’s a typo. Could you fix it? > > — John > > On Jul 29, 2014, at 7:23 AM, Andrei Berceanu <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > nice, ty! > btw, the manual at > http://julia.readthedocs.org/en/latest/stdlib/linalg/#Base.repeat says > repeat(*A*, *inner = Int*, []*outer = Int*[]) > shouldn't that be > repeat(*A*, *inner = Int*[], *outer = Int*[]) > i.e isn't the comma in the wrong position? > > On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 4:06:22 PM UTC+2, John Myles White wrote: >> >> repeat([1, 2, 3], inner = [2]) >> >> On Jul 29, 2014, at 7:03 AM, Andrei Berceanu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Whats the easiest way of going from an array >> > [1,2,3] -> [1,1,2,2,3,3] >> > i.e. repeating all elements 2 (or more generally, n) times? >> > >> > A >> >> >
