That explains why the github page showed the right syntax! *head bump A
On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 5:10:42 PM UTC+2, Matt Bauman wrote: > > That's because Sphinx identifies [] as optional arguments in the > ..function macro-thingy, and it does funny re-arrangements with it. The > source is correct; it's the output that is wrong. It's annoying, but I've > not dug into Sphinx enough to determine how we might disable it. > > On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 10:24:01 AM UTC-4, John Myles White wrote: >> >> Yeah, that’s a typo. Could you fix it? >> >> — John >> >> On Jul 29, 2014, at 7:23 AM, Andrei Berceanu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> nice, ty! >> btw, the manual at >> http://julia.readthedocs.org/en/latest/stdlib/linalg/#Base.repeat says >> repeat(*A*, *inner = Int*, []*outer = Int*[]) >> shouldn't that be >> repeat(*A*, *inner = Int*[], *outer = Int*[]) >> i.e isn't the comma in the wrong position? >> >> On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 4:06:22 PM UTC+2, John Myles White wrote: >>> >>> repeat([1, 2, 3], inner = [2]) >>> >>> On Jul 29, 2014, at 7:03 AM, Andrei Berceanu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Whats the easiest way of going from an array >>> > [1,2,3] -> [1,1,2,2,3,3] >>> > i.e. repeating all elements 2 (or more generally, n) times? >>> > >>> > A >>> >>> >>
