Whatever, if I rtfm, especially the part saying "Operators Are Functions" (with the only exceptions of && and ||, because of short-circuit evaluation), then I conclude that the error message following &(x,y) is not a feature, it's a bug. And whether we like a generated parser or not, it's better than a buggy one, imho. Sure grammar can be ambiguous, but there are techniques to get around that, like here: http://accent.compilertools.net/Accent.html
- Re: [julia-users] function version of & Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] function version of & Elliot Saba
- Re: [julia-users] function version of &a... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] function version ... gentlebeldin
- Re: [julia-users] function vers... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] function vers... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] function vers... gentlebeldin
- Re: [julia-users] function vers... Jeff Bezanson
- Re: [julia-users] function vers... Jason Merrill
- [julia-users] function version ... Jameson Nash
- [julia-users] Re: function version of & gentlebeldin
- Re: [julia-users] Re: function version of & Stefan Karpinski
