> > if your license is in maintenance
There's the rub: not just a steep one-time cost, but rather a yearly, ongoing multi-thousand-dollar tax. That's good work if you can get it. On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Andreas Lobinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 4:28:24 PM UTC+2, Stefan Karpinski wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:51 AM, moritz braun <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> However the standard journals will probably tell me, that this language >>> is to "immature etc." >>> >> >> Do you have any specific reason to think they will do this? I've never >> heard of a journal saying anything about an author's choice of programming >> language. For the scientific record, Julia already has a higher level of >> reproducibility than commercial software. You can easily get a copy of the >> exact version of Julia that was used in any experiment. You cannot, on the >> other hand, get a copy of the specific version of Matlab that was used when >> a paper was published – you can only hope that MathWorks hasn't changed >> things in an incompatible way, which is not always the case. >> > > As a long-term matlab user, i can assure you, it's not a problem to get a > copy of a specific matlab version (if your license is in maintenance). > However, just by looking at the code, you cannot identifiy which version of > matlab you need to get. So you can only hope, it's somewhere in the > metadata. But julia shares that problem. > > > >
