There's a list (of such lists) at http://svaksha.github.io/Julia.jl/ . But you are right: something more complete and more up-to-date would be nice. I started an overview of Math packages with usage examples, but stopped when the Julia 0.4 version came about.
On Monday, December 22, 2014 4:59:24 PM UTC+1, [email protected] wrote: > > Does it make sense to have a list of unregistered packages ? I'd like to > make my packages visible, for feedback or whatever, and also to see what > other packages are out there. > > Putting a new package that no one has used in the same list as a heavily > used/developed package doesn't seem right. > My packages have interfaces that are too big, and need to be > pruned/altered after people use them. Still, it would be nice > to be able to install them easily, so maybe a separate metadata repo, or a > tag 'experimental' would work. (It would not make sense to register them in > another list and then still call them 'unregistered') I guess Julia will > have to deal with something like this sooner or later. > > github says there are about 2000 Julia repos. Surely not all are meant to > be packages. I have a Swap.jl repo on github just so I can install it > easily myself. But I wonder how many of the 2000 are useable packages? > > This must have been discussed already somewhere, but I can't find it. > >
