No official policy yet, but we should have one. Ditto for package naming. On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Max Suster <[email protected]> wrote:
> A little bit off-topic, but are there criteria for what is needed to make > a package ready for inclusion in METADATA? For example, some packages may > require more documentation or may be unstable due to external depencies but > are nevertheless necessary to support others. > Any thoughts on this?
