Thanks, Jacob, this is what I was looking for.
-Tom

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Jacob Quinn <[email protected]> wrote:

> I know there's been a lot of discussion [here](
> https://github.com/JuliaStats/Roadmap.jl/issues/11) in the past, though
> not very recently. I would imagine there would be even more willing to
> participate in pushing things forward at this point (myself included). I'd
> say chiming in there would most likely get some great response.
>
> -Jacob
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Tom Fawcett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> True, but yes, not very satisfying.
>>
>> It seems like there's a good intersection of Julia people with machine
>> learning people.  I was thinking there might already be an effort underway
>> to develop a native ML framework for Julia.  Since I'm an ML person I'd
>> like to get involved.  But I'm new to Julia so I probably wouldn't be the
>> best person to lead such an effort.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Tom
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You can always call scikit learn from Julia using PyCall. Not sure how
>>> satisfying that would be for what you had in mind though.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Tom Fawcett <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Fellow humans,
>>>>
>>>> I realize there are various machine learning algorithms implemented in
>>>> Julia.  Is there anything like a machine learning framework, similar to
>>>> scikit-learn, under development?
>>>>
>>>> Of course, Julia already has many of the capabilities of Numpy & Scipy
>>>> so that's most of the way.  I'm imagining a package (or meta-package) to
>>>> provide a common processing framework (comprising IO, pre-processing, core
>>>> ML algs, evaluation, visualization, etc.) with a set of APIs.  It would
>>>> provide a standard way to string together components so anyone can set up
>>>> an ML processing stream or contribute a new module.
>>>>
>>>> Is anything in the works?  I did a brief search and didn't find
>>>> anything.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Tom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to