> Is there an example of the use of this new syntax for 0.4? It's in the manual: http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/stdlib/base/?highlight=call#Base.call http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/manual/constructors/?highlight=call#constructors-call-and-conversion
> Thanks, > > Petr > > On Sunday, January 11, 2015 at 12:20:39 PM UTC-8, Tobias Knopp wrote: >> >> The call syntax is part of 0.4 >> >> Cheers >> >> Tobi >> >> Am Sonntag, 11. Januar 2015 19:35:06 UTC+1 schrieb Petr Krysl: >>> >>> On Sunday, January 11, 2015 at 10:22:05 AM UTC-8, Tim Holy wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Already implement in julia 0.4. >>>> >>> >>> Very cool! Just checking: are you saying that the solution I proposed >>> with the empty types would actually address the problem of functions >>> being inefficient as when passed in as callbacks, and that this is now >>> part of 0.4? Or rather that the syntactic sugar of being able to call on >>> object is part of 0.4? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> P >>> >>
