See also: http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/manual/methods/#call-overloading-and-function-like-objects
On Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 4:29:57 AM UTC-5, Mauro wrote: > > > Is there an example of the use of this new syntax for 0.4? > > It's in the manual: > http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/stdlib/base/?highlight=call#Base.call > > http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/manual/constructors/?highlight=call#constructors-call-and-conversion > > > > Thanks, > > > > Petr > > > > On Sunday, January 11, 2015 at 12:20:39 PM UTC-8, Tobias Knopp wrote: > >> > >> The call syntax is part of 0.4 > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> Tobi > >> > >> Am Sonntag, 11. Januar 2015 19:35:06 UTC+1 schrieb Petr Krysl: > >>> > >>> On Sunday, January 11, 2015 at 10:22:05 AM UTC-8, Tim Holy wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Already implement in julia 0.4. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Very cool! Just checking: are you saying that the solution I > proposed > >>> with the empty types would actually address the problem of > functions > >>> being inefficient as when passed in as callbacks, and that this is > now > >>> part of 0.4? Or rather that the syntactic sugar of being able to call > on > >>> object is part of 0.4? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> P > >>> > >> > >
