You can define it like this:
foo(1, 2, 3; many_more::Int=error("many_more is a required keyword
argument"))
We may, in the future, allow this to be written this way:
foo(1, 2, 3; many_more::Int)
but currently that won't work.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:34 PM, AVF <[email protected]> wrote:
> I want to write a function foo(x, y, z, many_more), which I could call as
> foo(1,
> 2, 3, 5) or foo(1, 2, 3, many_more=5), but I don't want to have to supply
> a default value for many_more in my function's definition. I just want to
> have the option of not remembering the positions of x...many_more without
> required having default values for them.
>
> Is that currently possible? Thanks...
>
