Thanks!
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]>
wrote:
> You can define it like this:
>
> foo(1, 2, 3; many_more::Int=error("many_more is a required keyword
> argument"))
>
>
> We may, in the future, allow this to be written this way:
>
> foo(1, 2, 3; many_more::Int)
>
>
> but currently that won't work.
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:34 PM, AVF <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I want to write a function foo(x, y, z, many_more), which I could call
>> as foo(1, 2, 3, 5) or foo(1, 2, 3, many_more=5), but I don't want to
>> have to supply a default value for many_more in my function's
>> definition. I just want to have the option of not remembering the positions
>> of x...many_more without required having default values for them.
>>
>> Is that currently possible? Thanks...
>>
>
>
