I wouldn't be surprised if `x[:] = y` dispatched to the `copy!` function and was actually exactly equivalent.
On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 7:38:32 PM Kirill Ignatiev <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday, 9 February 2015 19:07:37 UTC-5, Patrick O'Leary wrote: >> >> I think you can go with >> >> copy!(x, y) >> > > That's it, thank you. > >
