I wouldn't either, but copy!() is probably clearer, and at extremely low risk of ever meaning anything else.
On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:14:09 PM UTC-6, Jameson wrote: > > I wouldn't be surprised if `x[:] = y` dispatched to the `copy!` function > and was actually exactly equivalent. > > On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 7:38:32 PM Kirill Ignatiev < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On Monday, 9 February 2015 19:07:37 UTC-5, Patrick O'Leary wrote: >>> >>> I think you can go with >>> >>> copy!(x, y) >>> >> >> That's it, thank you. >> >> >
