>
>  I'd also like a REPL command which prints out a list of all of the 
> objects currently in memory space (like 'whos' in Octave)

I'd recommend you try the obscurely named whos() in Julia :)

torsdag 5. mars 2015 14.38.05 UTC+1 skrev David Higgins følgende:
>
> Oh, and an IDE is the other requirement of my hard core programming 
> brethren. The debugger is higher on their list of priorities, but the IDE 
> is also vital (and one capable of handling projects, etc. we do large scale 
> numerical projects).
>
> David.
>
> On Thursday, 5 March 2015 14:35:23 UTC+1, David Higgins wrote:
>>
>> I agree with many of the comments above. I recommend Julia only to a 
>> subset of my colleagues. From Matlab the barrier to entry is incredibly low 
>> and you gain on both speed and price, the only argument against is that 
>> Matlab users tend to have years of experience in their one language and not 
>> such a habit of learning new languages.
>>
>> I personally moved from mainly GPGPU based programming using C; despite 
>> the difficulty of that field I found the move painful due to a lack of 
>> detailed documentation (my perception). Don't get me wrong, there's enough 
>> documentation out there to make a decent stab at getting things done. But 
>> I'm used to having a much more nuanced understanding of a language and the 
>> documentation doesn't yet go into this level of detail, nor are there 
>> sufficient examples out there.
>>
>> For my colleagues who are strong programmers (Python particularly), they 
>> refuse to touch the language until there's a debugger. At the very least 
>> they want to be able to set breakpoints and run to them. Personally, I'd 
>> also like a REPL command which prints out a list of all of the objects 
>> currently in memory space (like 'whos' in Octave). This seems like a basic 
>> requirement for REPL based numerical programming.
>>
>> Julia is elegant and growing strongly, but I'm still quite selective 
>> about who I proselytise to. I have the feeling that it will be so many 
>> times a more comfortable experience in 6-12 months time that I'd rather not 
>> colour people's early experiences in a negative light if better is soon to 
>> come.
>>
>> David.
>>
>

Reply via email to