On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 8:16:57 AM UTC-4, Scott Jones wrote: > > Another thought... would it be possible to get DecimalFloatingPoint, and > maybe the 3 types Dec32, Dec64, and Dec128 moved to Base? > Not the implementation, but rather just the types, which would be the same > no matter what Decimal floating point package you use... >
If another package is created using decNumber, for example, it can simply use the same type names as DecFP for the same binary formats. I don't see any advantage to putting the type names into Base.
