I'm always available to advocate for consonant symmetry and autodydactic expressiveness on Julia's behalf. The consensual upwelling that let the broader decision deserves respect. That motive intent was to finalize one important tailoring of Julia's experience -- the experiences we each have. A few erstwhile appropriate [un]capitalizations are now sharps, and their was never a desire to elevate the ontological necessity of "symbol" qua "symbol annon "Symbol" over Julia's advancement and the invitingness people find as the use this.
On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 8:57:44 AM UTC-4, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 12:02:36 PM UTC-4, Matt Bauman wrote: >> >> `float` is an interesting case as it's regularly used to generically >> mean: convert to a floating point number *OR* a complex number with >> floating point components, so that's why it's still here but `int` isn't. >> > > float(x) means "give me the floating-point version of x". It works on any > kind of number, but also on arrays and potentially other containers. >
