>
> (2) Did you try @profile versioninfo() followed by Profile.print()?
>
The result is very long, but I posted it here: http://pastebin.com/dBfXmxfy.
You can try `@time srand("/dev/urandom")` and see how long it takes.
>
julia> @time srand("/dev/urandom")
elapsed time: 0.278176012 seconds (15944 bytes allocated)
julia> @time srand("/dev/urandom")
elapsed time: 0.254156666 seconds (664 bytes allocated)
On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 1:19:03 PM UTC-4, Elliot Saba wrote:
>
> I believe his machine is 64-bit (that's what WORD_SIZE: 64 means in
> versioninfo() above), he merely has 32 cores. :)
> -E
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:05 AM, <[email protected] <javascript:>>
> wrote:
>
>> I am probably the wrong person to help with this since I know next to
>> nothing about the internals of Julia, Linux or intel processors... but let
>> me toss out the following remarks:
>>
>> (1) Your earlier messages state that your processors are 32-bit and yet
>> you are running a 64-bit version of Julia. Did you try downloading and
>> testing a 32-bit version of Julia?
>>
>> (2) Did you try @profile versioninfo() followed by Profile.print()?
>>
>> -- Steve Vavasis
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 11:29:53 AM UTC-4, Chris wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought so. Is there a different function in 0.3 that will give the
>>> same kind of information? Any other ideas?
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 8:16:56 PM UTC-4, Steven G. Johnson
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 8:15:18 PM UTC-4, Chris wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: RandomDevice not defined
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 6:13:12 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you do @time RandomDevice() and see how long that takes?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> RandomDevice() is only in Julia 0.4.
>>>>
>>>
>
